Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbo123

What’s hilarious is that the NR has never come out with a blistering editorial against various Republicans who have held office since the 1960s compromising and working with Democrats on the ongoing destruction of our country.


34 posted on 01/21/2016 4:24:45 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Mark Steyn yesterday I think, pointed out that the mere word ‘bipartisanship’ MEANS Uniparty. And the more bipartisanship you’ve got, the more Uniparty you’ve got. It’s bad. Really bad. But they say it like it’s good.


93 posted on 01/21/2016 4:51:19 PM PST by ichabod1 (Spriiingtime for islam, and tyranny. Winter for US and frieeends. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

National Review has been calling out moderate and liberal Republicans ever since the magazine was founded in the mid-fifties. You obviously didn’t realize that Buckley and Bill Rusher were behind Goldwater running against Nixon in 1960 and Rockefeller in 1964.


142 posted on 01/21/2016 5:47:49 PM PST by Oklahoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson