I stopped listening to Levin just this week, after unending days of defending Cruz and criticizing Trump over minutiae such as ethanol. Instead of leading his show with Hillary’s many misdeeds which continue to surface, he has been shilling for Cruz.
Seeing that there is a backchannel connection to Cruz, I can’t trust Mark’s legal analysis of the NBC issue any longer. How can one be sure that this is objective, rather than a hack’s attempt to advance an argument in hopes that the public and the courts will agree?
Credibility takes a long time to build, but a very short time to destroy.
Exactly, what would his fiancee say if he said he was not a NBC and hurt Cruz’ chances for President. It would hurt her son’s career. He cannot say that. So his opinion is completely biased.