Read her dissent, sounded more like an endorsement, but said IMO the private sector should be the driving force. Nowhere did I see Goldman Sachs mentioned. Why do you feel the need to embellish it with what’s not there. A IMO would have been more credible.
Not sure of this approach, don’t like the open borders, but I’ve always thought that really the only way it to make it more cost effective to them to stay in their own country, is to cut off the goodies here. Just building a wall is not enough.
Doesn't have to be mentioned. That's who will benefit and that's who she works for as a vice president.
Not sure of this approach
It's "Free Trade" ideology taken to its maximum logic: free movement of labor along with free movement of all goods along with a loss of sovereignty in favor of big business and globalism.