The very first sentence of her "dissent" expresses her support for the report and its recommendations. Your BS about her "dissenting view" "only" emphasizing the need to let the private market blah blah blah ignores her support for open borders. What Heidi wants is for Goldman Sachs to get its cut of the pie once the US gets to work fixing Mexico's crappy economy.
You Trumpbots are really nuts. The format of the report places the quoted passage under the heading Additional and or Dissenting Views. She gave a perfunctory statement of support and then emphasized (I used the word emphasized to give even Trumpbots a clue that I was going to talk about what she emphasized) the importance of private markets. You might have heard that emphasis on private markets is a kind of conservative view of how things should work.
Of course, you Trumpbots pick on these absolutely stupid points because it sure beats trying to explain away Trump’s outrageously anti-conservative record, his spectacular inconsistency, his past support and praise for Hillary and Bill Clinton and his generally thuggish behavior. But let’s talk about a wonky 2005 report the candidate’s wife had some small role in. Yeah, that’s important. You are all morphing into little Paul Begalas and James Carvilles. Sick.