http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102
This is circulating.
Cruz responded to it yet?
Digging up old news again?
Cruz has discussed it before and spread the lie that Heidi was just a “dissident” member. Heidi, however, endorsed the report and its recommendations, and her only “dissent” was in making sure that Goldman Sachs gets its cut of the goodies. Cruz will say he didn’t really lie, he just didn’t tell us the whole story, which is the usual way he tells lies.
WHO’S GOT THE CRUZ PING LIST?
Was this before or after the cops considered her a danger to herself?
This should be all over the major networks and all broadcast news. Why is Cruz being protected? He is turning out worse then I even suspected. Of course from day 1, I knew he was a fraud. You can definitely predict the Cruzy’s will be out giving some dumb excuse for him.
Also here: http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2015/04/04/is-ted-cruz-an-advocate-of-a-north-american-union/
“It includes a recommendation to build a European Union style abolition of borders between Mexico and the United States.”
Dear God. This crazed committee wants there to be an open border... -nothing- separating us from the cartels and 122 million Mexicans who live in the dirty, ignorance infested, childlike poverty. Literally millions of them don’t even understand basic sanitation.
Did Heidi ever publically disavow the work of the committee, or do anything to expose it?
BTW were Sen. Cruz and Rubio in Washington to cast their vote on the Muslim Refugee Visa thing today? Or were they absent and now unfettered access by some 300K potential terrorists to the interior of our country?
Another story on it:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/trump-threatens-north-american-union-scheme/
So Goldman Sachs funds both Hillary and Cruz... and Cruz’s wife works for them... and she wrote an article about open bordering North America...
Something not adding up here.
Margaret Thatcher in England, I believe her husband kept a very low profile. So that goes for both sexes.
This is not aimed at any candidate because it is spread around. But a CFR connection disqualifies a candidate in my opinion.
It’s a lot more serious than Ted taking legitimate loans from his banker.
1. From 2005
2. Heidi, not Ted, Cruz
3. She was one of 31 members of the commission
4. She is not identified as a principal author
5. Her additional/dissenting view only emphasizes the need to let the private market dictate investment initiatives, not the governments
6. There is nothing near an EU type of confederation of the three countries in the report
7. At a glance, the substance of the report is amorphous feel-good talk about cooperation without impairing the sovereignty of any country.
Conclusion: Another nothingburger hit piece on Ted Cruz
Husbands and Wives usually share common ideals and goals; there has been no evidence to the contrary with the Cruzs.
Here is the plan Heidi Cruz helped prepare and which she endorses. It is a form of “governance” inconsistent with our form of government.
http://i.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf
You should know by now you won’t change minds.
Especially since you are gaga for all Trump who has faults that make Cruz exceedingly good.
At least Cruzers are in it for conservative principles not the trump cult of personality.
The answer to all articles about Trump’s past? Doesn’t matter. That was then (even if yesterday). Trump flip flops? Doesn’t matter.
And you think you drag up any conjecture and it matters? Works both ways. Good luck.
"We must emphasize the imperative that economic investment be led and perpetuated by the private sector. There is no force proven like the market for aligning incentives, sourcing capital, and producing results like financial markets and profit-making businesses. This is simply necessary to sustain a higher living standard for the poorest among us — truly the measure of our success. As such, investment funds and financing mechanisms should be deemed attractive instruments by those committing the capital and should only be developed in conjunction with market participants."
Very interesting.
there was a time when a conservative whose wife was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations would have been embarassed for it even to be known
More importantly, Sen. Goldman Sachs Cruz
voted to allow the vote on SECRET ObamaTRADE
for Obama, foreign gov’ts, his past loans .... and his wife.
We all stopped supporting the typical
GOP=phoney Sen. Cruz that day.