Posted on 01/20/2016 6:12:26 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
Today, as predicted by many in the media who have been following this case, Klayman v. Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation (15-cv-80388 S.D. Fla), a federal judge appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton, dismissed a lawsuit, filed under the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") and other causes of action, which was based on the Clintons' acceptance of money from foreign and other donors in exchange for favors while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. In addition to filing suit, Larry Klayman asked the judge, Donald M. Middlebrooks, to take into custody Hillary Clinton's private email server and the thumb drive containing classified information - still in possession of her attorney, David Kendall. The predicate acts of RICO alleged in the complaint hinged on the obstruction of justice in defendants having secreted or destroyed emails evidencing their crimes, most notably the sale of waivers to do business with Iran and the release of classified information about U.S.-Israeli war plans should the nuclear facilities of this terrorist state have to be removed militarily.
(Excerpt) Read more at freedomwatchusa.org ...
Searched and did not find this posted yet.
Would you expect anything different with politically appointed judges with lifetime tenure?
Can this be appealed
At some point, the crap is gonna stick.
Would you expect anything different with politically appointed judges with lifetime tenure?
Wouldn’t this be the perfect situation for a judge to recuse himself? Being asked to decide guilt/innocence of the people who appointed him to a coveted lifetime position?
“Avoid even the appearance of impropriety.”
Hah!
Like I’ve said for many years... the Clintons aren’t subject to the same laws as are the rest of us. It’s an unfortunate and maddening flaw in our legal system, but it is most certainly the case.
Anyone who thinks Hillary will face indictment over emails, Benghazi or the Clinton Foundation is smoking some very powerful crack. There are far too many powerful forces at work to keep her out of trouble. It simply isn’t going to happen... ever.
Ya know, with most people just the assumption of the kind of impropriety of a RICO charge may very well ruin a lot of people, but it just seems to be no more than a speed bump in the road for these people....amazing.
Dem politics in action, nothing to see here. YAWN
Has Larry Klayman ever won a case? Always the same with that guy. Raise money and get dismissed.
Trump is gonna be LIVID.
Klayman can refile the suit and take a chance on getting a different judge. But it depends on how the case was dismissed...with or without prejudice. Either way, no suit will be allowed to proceed before the election. ANY election.
I give Klayman a lot of credit in uncovering the Clinton email server. That was HIM.
What? And take a chance on winding up on this list?
It needs lots of publicity.
I don’t think the Clintons have that sort of raw power anymore. But, I can see how that list would give one pause.
When you make a Faustian bargain, you’d better think twice before you welsh.
No, that was Judicial Watch, that Klayman used to head up. When he was there they never won anything. They've been very productive since he moved on.
Surprise!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.