[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

--- When the Daily Caller's Jamie Weinstein asked Trump if he would have become pro-life if that child had been a loser instead of a "total superstar," Trump replied: "Probably not, but I've never thought of it. I would say no but in this case it was an easy one because he's such an outstanding person."

That Trump could go from supporting third-trimester abortion--something indistinguishable from infanticide, something that only 14 percent of Americans think should be legal--to becoming pro-life because of that one experience is a bit hard to believe. If it's true, the story still indicates at the very least that Trump is not capable of serious moral reasoning.---

When I learned that Obama was the only legislator to oppose the partial birth abortion ban, I knew all I needed to know.

Yesterday I wrote a lengthy post, saying that Trump doesn't have a firm grasp on good and evil...

You either get this or you don't. But this is a very, very bad sign.

[Elsie]

Yesterday I wrote a lengthy post, saying that Trump doesn't have a firm grasp on good and evil...

Neither does AMERICA!

He is PERFECT!!

[don-o]

When the Daily Caller's Jamie Weinstein asked Trump....

When I read that I immediately went looking for source. So far...not finding it.

If accurate this is absolutely a death blow for pro-lifers support of DT.

Source must be found.

[sitetest]

Ah, heck. The kenyan anti-christ wouldn’t even vote to protect kids ONCE THEY WERE BORN! He voted AGAINST Illinois’ version of the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. You’d think, after surviving all that, he’d cut the kids a break.