Replies

Actually the Hawaii Health Directors and the Registrar of Vital Staistics have issued six statements of confirmation including one for the Republican Secretary of State in Arizona, who then cleared Obama for the ballot, one for the Republican Secretary of State in Kansas who then cleared Obama for the Kansas ballot and one for a Ronald Reagan appointed federal judge in Mississippi who then dismissed a lawsuit in that state which challenged Obama’s eligibility.
http://health.hawaii.gov/vitalrecords/files/2013/05/08-93.pdf
http://health.hawaii.gov/vitalrecords/files/2013/05/09-063.pdf
http://health.hawaii.gov/vitalrecords/files/2013/05/News_Release_Birth_Certificate_042711.pdf
http://archive.azcentral.com/12news/Obama-Verification.pdf
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/106576604
http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/96289285
(See the exhibits on last two pages of the Motion To Supplement Counsel.)

There is also Abercrombie saying that there was no BC on record but there was a hand written notation in the archives. Fukino has been all over the place with her statements. The first one that they have his original BC on record is consistent with a foreign birth being registered with Hawaii ( and also Abercrombies statement about the record in the archives ). She did not say they have his original Hawaii BC on record. I find it interesting where his lawyers , in a motion to the court, referenced a digital image of the BC instead of actually submitting the paper copy with the seal to the court ( or could have instructed Hawaii to release one directly to the court.) As far as the Sec of State of Arizona is concerned, he has no credibility. The day after they sent the "certification" to him, I sent him an email asking him 3 questions. Here are the questions and his answers.

Did you originally ask for verification of the Date of birth ?

Yes

If so, why was that excluded from the verification ? Was it at the suggestion of the Hawaii Attorney General or Director of Health ?

I don't know why it was excluded. I assume it was an error by whoever typed the verification.

If you excluded it at their suggestion, wouldn't that raise some questions in your mind ?

N/A

Now any competent Sec of State, when asking for a verification of a record, got back in the verification a missing field vital to the verification and assumed it was a typing error, would request another verification, not accept the one with the error as accurate.

Well, I guess we will have to agree to disagree on this issue. Nothing short of a certified copy released directly from the State of Hawaii to a court will convince me.