Replies

You just updated the 1952 argument of Eisenhower over Taft.

50 posted on 01/15/2016 5:34:58 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)

No, Eisenhower defeating the Dem nominee wasn't required in order to save the Republic. It was a Christian nation. 88 percent white, 12 percent black. No Mexicans. Not a single damn Muzzie in sight. Anti-Communist. There was no proposal to fundamentally transform the place, no chance that 4 years of a Dem would end America.

This election is existential. Win it with the wrong Republican and we lose America through amnesty and political correctness. Lose it to a Dem and there will be amnesty and national health care to replace Obamacare, and replacement of American voters by new ones. It will be all over for us, the remnants.

So, nice try, but this isn't 1952. That was America. This isn't.

65 posted on 01/15/2016 6:14:27 PM PST by Defiant (RINOs are leaders of a party without voters. Trump/Cruz are leaders of voters without a party.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794