Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
Of course there is a 3rd category.

There are citizens who are natural born.

There are/were citizens who were exempted from the NBC requirement if they were alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

There are naturalized citizens.

Exactly what was the distinction between those citizens who were exempted and those who were ‘natural born citizens?’

Few will address that when their opinion is agenda driven.

171 posted on 01/14/2016 4:28:21 PM PST by Radix ("..Democrats are holding a meeting today to decide whether to overturn the results of the election.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Radix
"There are/were citizens who were exempted from the NBC requirement if they were alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution."

None of which exist any longer, so there is no third category.

"Exactly what was the distinction between those citizens who were exempted and those who were 'natural born citizens?'"

"Few will address that when their opinion is agenda driven."

It's been addressed plenty of times. It's obvious. Americans who were alive at the time of adoption of the Constitution became citizens of the US when the US was founded. They weren't naturalized, but they weren't born US citizens either. When they were born there was no US. That's all it means. At the moment of adoption there were no "natural born citizens", but the next baby born in the US became one.

The passage is there so that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and the other people of that generation weren't excluded from being President by the natural born clause.

177 posted on 01/14/2016 7:16:45 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson