Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mongrel

Let’s suppose that the dems had legal standing to insist that Donald Trump undergo a psychological evaluation before he could become President and promised they were going to do it as soon as he became the Republican candidate. Now let’s also suppose that the dems had a history of only giving licenses to psychologists who would join their club that meets secretly every month to decide who will take what political patient so they can rule them mentally incompetent. And suppose that the dems also have at their disposal all the NSA data with which to blackmail any psychologist they want to, and also have a history of getting rid of (as in killing) people who oppose their plan.

In such a case, do you think it would be simply “mean” if the primary opponent, who had standing to insist on a psychological evaluation and who is mutually despised by the psychologists who might do it, filed suit to have that psychological screening done on Trump when the motivation to disqualify Trump is reduced because there’s another candidate the psychologists hate just as much who has already shown his mental competence and would then be the candidate if they rule Trump mentally incompetent?

Think, please.


96 posted on 01/14/2016 6:57:55 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: butterdezillion

When Donald talks about Cruz, he’s not really concerned. He’s just trying to put out a kill shot. Being a concern troll. Learned it from him.


97 posted on 01/14/2016 7:01:36 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson