Posted on 01/13/2016 4:25:57 PM PST by TBBT
It is hard not to feel protective over Donald Trump while the political classes are seething and scornful.
They are unacquainted with such powerlessness. Control was never supposed to stray this far from their grasp. And their rage, manifested in every hapless attack on Trump and his supporters, actually seems to be improving the likelihood of that outcome they fear most of all.
How tempting, under these circumstances, to rush to his defense, as so many in the conservative movement have already done. The Donald has boldly made himself a standard bearer of unpopular (â¦within the political bubble), yet critical policy positions concerning national security, from the urgency of immigration enforcement to the potential implications of refugee resettlement.
He has played a pivotal role in dragging these and other issues from the shadows that the media might otherwise have not been so quick to shine a light on. He has made the case against birthright citizenship, spent countless campaign hours pledging to build a wall, and talked tough to the politically correct mafia at a time when its fascistic influence has left millions of citizens feeling voiceless.
Trumpâs style and substanceâbrazen, unapologetic and quite popularâhave upended equanimity on the left, leaving the âpublic intellectualsâ screaming over one another to denounce his absurdity, the effrontery, the horror.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativereview.com ...
Wow. Imagine that: a gutsy, hardliner conservative endorsing the only conservative running for president.
“You are wrong again.”
Trump was running, was on the ballot, and even participated in some debates. That would make him a politician at that point. Trump even had a campaign website...geez. I guess facts really are too much for Trumpsters!
“It is illegal only is if there is a quid-pro-quo which can be proven in court.”
You’re the one, along with other Trumpsters, and Trump himself that said that he donated money in order to remove obstacles and get things done for his business. That is QUID-PRO-QUO. Donating money is one thing, but doing it specifically for favors is BRIBERY and is ILLEGAL!!
Btw, the reason I called Cruz a flip flopped was bc I thought he had backed off this position. Trump, as you know, says that no Constitutional amendment is needed. A correct reading of the 14th amendment does NOT obligate the US to reward the babies of every FOREIGN INVADER who manages to breach our borders and give birth, citizenship. After a number of reputable Constitutional scholars agreed with Trump, it was my understanding that Cruz jumped on the bandwagon. If you are sure he STILL supports national suicide by Constitution, I’ll use that as my revised critique.
If you don't believe that every pol does "favors" of some kind or another, for their BIG DONORS, you're a political naif.
You must live in a fantasy world if you are advocating that we just throw out the Constitution. Are you claiming that Trump will override the Constitution by executive order?
Sessions hasn’t endorsed anyone. He even says so in the article you linked.
I have never thought you were smart so you have just confirmed my original assessment of you.
“you’re a political naif.”
If you’re accusing Cruz of trading favors for money, then you’re a blatant LIAR without any proof. Trump already admitted to his CRIMINAL activity. I find it kind of funny that all of you Trumpsters were condemning the Clintons for the same behavior, but now that it is Trump doing it, all I hear are LAME excuses. Now I wonder, how many favors Trump traded...he MUST be a CORRUPT, owned stooge then!
“Sessions hasnât endorsed anyone”
That article was just to show that he had been to Cruz rallies too. It was countering the silly posts about the one Trump rally and the hat.
I can’t believe how naive to think Robert Mercer gave $31 million to Cruz campaign and Cruz Pacs because Robert has a man crush on Rafael Cruz? Please get real.
You didn’t read my post. Try again.
I was countering your fib about Sessions endorsing ANYONE.
And read post 104 while you’re at it.
“I canât believe how naive to think Robert Mercer...”
You can make all of the accusations and state all of the opinions that you want, but that does NOT make any of them true. You have NO PROOF!!
I DO have PROOF that Trump IS CORRUPT, by his own admission, and is therefore mostly like bought!
Then maybe you can explain why Sessions is actively condemning Trump’s attacks against Cruz and defending Cruz??? It sure sounds like Sessions has taken a side...and it is NOT with Trump.
Trump crowd in Council Bluffs, IA:
Come on Trump never formally ran for anything. Since you are so sure, I am sure you can provide a link to a debate or rally from before? Having a web-site does NOT constitute formal running for president.
Then maybe you should look at these rally pics then. Don’t forget to notice all of the empty seats at the Trump rally. LOL
Here are some pics of huge Cruz crowds and small Trump crowds. I guess Cruzâs support must be much larger than you imply, while Trumpâs support isnât quite as strong as you indicate.
Huge Cruz crowds:
http://s3.amazonaws.com/media.wbur.org/wordpress/11/files/2015/03/0323_cruz-624x480.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/93/91/31/93913114b964330915335b9cb2a29991.jpg
vs. tiny Trump Crowds:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/24/23/2CB066F800000578-3248214-image-a-2_1443132727378.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/23/23/2CB1092D00000578-3246791-image-a-2_1443046088866.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/09/25/15/2CC261EF00000578-3248214-image-a-1_1443191424447.jpg
How old are you FRiend?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.