George Romney was born in Mexico, but no one questioned his eligibility.
John McCain was born in Panama. Again, his eligibility was not a question. (Other things were.)
This is a desperate attempt to distract by the Establishment so we can’t discuss the real issues.
Both Mark Levin and Andrew Napolitano have explained why Cruz is clearly eligible. I’ll take their word over that of some developer.
The only word that matters is the judge’s. Do you really want to give Clinton’s “Magnificent Eight” the chance to knock out the only thing standing in the way of a dem presidency?
This has to be dealt with during the primary. By a judge/court.
I think Mccain is the only person to get a senate resolution asserting he was eligible, and the reason the senate bothered with that is that his eligibility was an issue in the public sphere.
-- Both Mark Levin and Andrew Napolitano have explained why Cruz is clearly eligible. I'll take their word over that of some developer. --
Do you make all determinations based on the word of others? I doubt it. You are capable of studying the question and reaching your own conclusion. Trump hasn't offered his conclusion - or he's withdrawn his previous sense that Cruz was qualified. Just because Trump is a flip flopper doesn't preclude you from making up your own mind.
The constitution isn't complicated on this subject. It says who is a citizen in article IV, Section 2, one short sentence, and in the 14th amendment. A grade schooler could understand it and apply it.