there is no way he can be and I love him...however if this keeps up we will have noone but ourselves to blame when we get a jihadist in the WH. The founders created this firewall for a reason.
Thank you for saying that. I agree. Watering down the constitutional requirements for eligibility is a very bad idea, we have already experienced the Obama disaster, why do we want to ever set ourselves up for another? It is time to re-confirm constitutional eligibility. No one, ever again, occupies the White House who does not meet those requirements — born on American soil, 2 citizen parents, age 35, 14 years in this country. And we need legislation requiring that each candidate most provide documentation that proves he/she meets those requirements. I also think that all presidential candidates should be required to obtain security clearances (which, had that been a requirement, 20 years ago, would have spared us the Clinton presidency, and there would be no Hillary now.)
Even if a jihadist ran, he would still have to be elected. It is no different than if a NBC jihadist were to run. The ultimate protection against electing a crazy is the electorate.