Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
I'm for the pipelines under CAPITALISM, and NOT "Eminent Domain".
If the two parties can't come to an agreement, then buy someone else's land who will sell.
58 posted on 01/10/2016 3:20:09 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Yosemitest

I appreciate the attempt to come up with a solution like that, but that isn’t reasoned either. I think you know that.

The pipeline needs to go in a fairly straight line for economic reasons. You can’t triple the cost of the pipeline by swerving back and forth and all around to avoid having to use someone’s back 40 to get the job done.


61 posted on 01/10/2016 3:23:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne ((It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: Yosemitest; DoughtyOne
I'm for the pipelines under CAPITALISM, and NOT "Eminent Domain". If the two parties can't come to an agreement, then buy someone else's land who will sell.

That's a cute way out of your problem. So where is Ted Cruz or any conservative politician arguing that oil pipelines should never make use of eminent domain, even though they do, all the time?

67 posted on 01/10/2016 3:27:26 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson