It would just be so much easier for her to bury this if she were in the oval office. Hence, the rabid effort.
In an April 28, 2008, ruling in the email scandal, Judge Royce C. Lamberth called Cheryl Mills’ participation in the matter “loathsome.”
Violations of law and regulations by Hillary Clinton and her then-Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills.
It sounds like Huma will be leaving the country very soon and will not get to be first lady after all.
All legal action must be timed to remove her from the race and still not make it possible for O to pardon her.
Jake Sullivan,key flunkie player, will he take one for Hillary! or squeal to make it easier on himself?
There won’t be anything done about Hillary, right now anyway, obuma and ValJar are involved and Lynch isn’t going to throw them under the bus...
If they were going to do anything about Hillary, they would already have done it....
tip of the iceberg
The 6 billion missin and The Clinton Foundation money will rock the world
The Daily Caller has exclusively confirmed that a top aide to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signed but failed to honor an official US govt separation agreement, which required her to surrender all work-related documents when she left office.
That aide, Huma Abedin, maintained control of emails she sent and received through a personal email account hosted on Clintons private email server for nearly two-and-a-half years after she left the agency in Feb. 2013. In signing the form----the OF-109-----but failing to turn over State Department records, Abedin may have opened herself up to criminal charges.
I have surrendered to responsible officials all classified or administratively controlled documents and material with which I was charged or which I had in my possession, reads Abedins signed OF-109, which The Daily Caller obtained through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed on its behalf by the watchdog group Cause of Action. I am not retaining in my possession, custody, or control, documents or material containing classified or administratively controlled information furnished to me during the course of such employment or developed as a consequence thereof,†the form reads. I have surrendered to responsible officials all unclassified documents, and papers relating to the official business of the Government acquired by me while in the employ of the Department.
In signing the form, outgoing US govt employees acknowledge that they have been advised that Section 1001 of Title 18, United States Code, provides criminal penalties for knowingly and willfully falsifying or concealing material fact in a statement or document submitted to any department or agency of the United States Government.
The FBI has expanded its investigation of Clintons home-brew email system and is now looking at whether materially false statements were given to federal agents, Fox News reported on Thursday. It is unclear whether the probe is focusing on Abedins OF-109. (RELATED: Report: FBI Investigating Whether Materially False Statements Given In Hillary Email Probe)
Abedins attorney, former State Department official Miguel Rodriguez, did not immediately respond to the request for comment. Nor did the Clinton campaign. Abedin and other Clinton aides, including Cheryl Mills and Philippe Reines, were ordered by a federal judge this summer to turn over all of the work-related emails they sent and received while in office.
Abedin, who used the email address huma@clintonemail.com, returned 6,714 emails in her possession in September. Mills and Reines, who used Yahoo and Google accounts, respectively, turned their emails over to the State Department in June. Clinton gave hers to the agency last December.
The records that the State Department provided to TheDC do not make it entirely clear if either Mills or Reines signed the OF-109. An internal State Department memo included in the FOIA release states that the agency has both an OF-109 and SF-312 for Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin. But while one of the documents provided to TheDC is an OF-109 with Mills name typed on it, it does not bear her signature.
A State Department official could neither explain the discrepancy nor confirm that Mills did not sign the agreement. If she did sign the form, she would come under the same scrutiny as Abedin. If she did not, that would raise questions over how and why the State Department allowed her to avoid such a routine measure.
State Department whistleblowers told TheDC in March that rank-and-file agency employees are required to sign the form. Failure to do so could result in the agency withholding benefits and conducting investigations into why the employees declined to sign the form, a whistle-blower said. (RELATED: Whistle-Blower: State Department Employees Who Dont Sign Separation Agreement Face Dire Consequences)
As for Clinton, a memo provided in the FOIA release shows that she did not sign an OF-109. While the State Department has already stated that it had no record of Clinton having signed the document, the memo provides the agencys rationale for why she didn't.
Departing secretaries of state do not complete an OF-109 due to their continued need for a security clearance after their resignation, the memo reads.On March 17, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said that the agency could find no record of Clinton having signed the OF-109. I think we/re fairly certain that she did not, we dont have record of it, Psaki said then.
The State Department declined to specifically address the significance of Abedins signing the OF-109. The State Department has undertaken great efforts to retrieve records from some individuals, including Huma Abedin.
The State Department asked her to send any records in her possession and were doing due diligence to make sure that were retrieving all of them,an official told TheDC.
Sen Grassley needs to determine:
<><> (1) whether Abedin is still on the State Dept payroll collecting govt checks (an old bureaucratic trick), and,
<><> (2) whether Abedin violated 18 U.S.C.§1027;
Abedin might have made false statements and colluded to conceal activities in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
It is also possible that Abedin’s collusion w/ Hillary, and other hidden offenses could include civil and/or criminal RICO violations. Hillary allowing Abedin’s several employments could also involve BUT not be limited to:
<><> Title 18 U.S.C. §1341, Mail Fraud, 18 U.S.C.§1001, Presenting a False Document to an Agent of the US Government (involves several felonies and could include forgery);
Possibly infractions centering on RICO conspiracies under 18 U.S.C. §1962(c); investigations could be warranted because (1) the persons (2) were employed by or associated with an enterprise (3) that engaged in or affected interstate and international commerce and that (4) the persons operated or managed the enterprise (5) through a “pattern†(6) of racketeering activity, and (7) the taxpayers were injured by reason of the “pattern†of racketeering activity.
Alleged Offenses could include Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §241 – Conspiracy Against Constitutional Rights – which prohibits in relevant part, “two or more persons (from conspiring) to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same . . .†See, 18 U.S.C. §241.
She basiclly orders others to break the law on her behalf.
Martha Stewart got prison time for far less.
Why should Mrs. Clinton be above the law?
