Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania
We don't need to amend the Constitution. We need to enforce the Constitution as it is. It's a very fine document.

Is the whole document fine, or do you exclude certain sections as not so fine?

Article V happens to be part of the Constitution, and the learned framers who put it there, did so for good reason.

Are you opposed to ANY amendments? Or, are amendments from the Congress AOK? Well, all Article V is, is a mechanism for amendments from the States as opposed to the Congress.

33 posted on 01/09/2016 8:48:42 AM PST by C210N (Supporting the Constitutional Conservative in the race. Constitutional Conservative Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: C210N

I’m not opposed to amendments in the future, if the nation survives. What I am opposed to is waiting for amendments to pass (if ever) as the way to save the US. A lot of the problems could be solved if the constitution is followed and executive orders are reversed. Then work on getting the unconstitutional laws off the books, judicially or legislatively. But before that process, talking about amending the Constitution just adds to the problem of getting things done NOW!!


52 posted on 01/09/2016 9:23:21 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson