Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pookie18

According Harvard, natural born citizen = citizen at birth. So if Cruz’s mother was a U.S. citizen when he was born, then according to that rule he is a natural born citizen. We haven’t yet seen proof that she was a U.S. citizen at the time of his birth.


66 posted on 01/06/2016 9:11:54 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Behind the Blue Wall
Who is even questioning his mother's citizenship?

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/yes-ted-cruz-can-be-president

70 posted on 01/06/2016 9:17:13 AM PST by pookie18 (10 months until the general election...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Behind the Blue Wall
Harvard is full of it (again)

The authors cite to the Naturalization Act of 1790 and ignore the fact that the Naturalization Act of 1795, with the lead of then-Rep. James Madison and with the approval of President George Washington, repealed it and specifically changed "shall be considered as natural born citizens" to "shall be considered as citizens of the United States."

James Madison the "father of the Constitution" changed the wording from "natural born citizen" to "citizen". Madison was no dope and the change was to prevent a foriegn born from becoming Commander in Chief. But this also serves to illustrate that "citizen at birth" does not mean "natural born citizen".

See more at
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/tag/harvard-law-review/

117 posted on 01/06/2016 10:36:35 AM PST by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson