Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: for-q-clinton

The “evidence” is inherent in the declaration of renunciation that was required for Canadian naturalization at the time.


56 posted on 01/06/2016 9:01:03 AM PST by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Behind the Blue Wall

The “evidence” is inherent in the declaration of renunciation that was required for Canadian naturalization at the time.
********************************************************************************
Evidence for what???


60 posted on 01/06/2016 9:03:00 AM PST by House Atreides (Cruzin' and Trumpin' or losin'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Behind the Blue Wall

Can you link to the law at the time that required them to renounce US Citizenship? I’m not familiar with 1950s Canadian immigration law.


76 posted on 01/06/2016 9:30:47 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Behind the Blue Wall

Also you’d still need to show on the US side that her citizenship was renounced. Just because Canada may say they require that doesn’t mean that she actually did it. That’s a Canadian issue not US to deal with.


79 posted on 01/06/2016 9:32:17 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson