Oh, wait. Never mind, it's just Charles.
Posted on 01/03/2016 9:22:40 PM PST by Olog-hai
The Islamic State (ISIS) group threatened Britain in an Internet video Sunday showing the killing of five "spies" it said worked with the international coalition fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria. [...]
"This is a message to David Cameron," says one of the gunmen. "How strange it is that we find ourselves today hearing an insignificant leader like you challenge the might of the Islamic State." [...]
"Only an imbecile would dare to wage war against a land where the law of Allah reigns supreme and where the people live under the justice and security of sharia" or Islamic law, the fighter says.
"We will continue to wage jihad...and one day invade your land, where we will rule by the sharia." ...
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
So they’re not content with just running the place like they do now?
Oh, wait. Never mind, it's just Charles.
What I would have liked to hear from you is that the people are forming a way to fight the Islamazation of the UK. Something like closing down the mosques and banning Islam would be a start. It would cause a war which is exactly what it will take to reverse this trend.
Basically Islam must be eradicated at the root. Whether or not those who choose to believe in the cult of Islam is up to them but for those choose to stick with it; they should be given the opportunity to leave or die. It will eventually come down to this anyway. Better to do it while there is still an English majority.
Islam is the enemy but those who choose to believe in it are too. Islam and the West are incompatible. The sooner the West comes to terms with this fact; the better it will be for all.
Islam with never give up its quest for taking over one country after another until the entire world is under Muslim control. This is not conjecture. This is what they believe; even the so-called moderate ones.
Same problem here.
I've been to a few motels in the last few years. Every one we've been to was run by E. Indians except one.
That one was a Holiday Inn on the south side of the Potomac in DC. That one was run by Muslims. Every employee we saw was wearing some form of Muslim garb.
“Last time I was in London I could not find any small affordable hotels that were Anglo owned. Not a one”.........
Guess you are not traveling in the U.S. much as MANY of the smaller, affordable hotel/motels are not owned by Anglos either. Our gubmint helps these minorities take ownerships.
In WWI Prince Louis of Battenburg changed the family name to Mountbatten to ease anti German sentiment. Prince Phillip is a Mountbatten.
That’s like Hillary saying she is deploying her Secret weapon Bill Clinton.SECRET WEAPON? Bill has been her meal ticket her whole life,this just proves their arrangement,the slob Hillary would be nowhere without the leech
yea that’s already done..
I personally think that one essential element to this is to ensure the safety of those Muslims who wanted to escape Sharia and the Islamic theocratic governments of their home countries, and who just want to live and be happy, raise their families, and be like the rest of us. They are also afraid. It's difficult to promote modernity within the ranks when the threat of reprisal is very real. There is a split within Islam that needs to be widened, and it's not just between Sunnis and Shias. This requires at the very least official law and an official binding declaration that Sharia, or any form of ‘alternative law’ that conflicts with the law of the land and/or individual natural rights shall not be allowed to be practiced within the borders of the nation by anyone. Put real bite in the enforcement, and make it clear that setting up a ‘nation within a nation’ will never be tolerated.
By saying this, I am not discounting in any way the very real and imminent threat that fundamental Islam is. While trying to accomplish the above, it's also essential that immigration laws are changed such that rapid demographic shifts are not allowed. They are destabilizing in the best of circumstances, and represent the Achilles heal of open societies.
IIRC, `Berg’ means mountain, so Battenberg became Mountbatten; `Burg’ means city.
Anyway, U.S. and Britain both have tough-minded citizens living in them, but they’re not the ones in the driver’s seat.
The appeasers are in charge in both countries.
Islam is God’s punishment for turning away from Him.
Correct you are!
Britain must have welcomed the 3,000,000th scout, errrr refugee. Assets are now in place.
The hotel I stayed at in London in September offered prayer rugs as an amenity.
I’m just wondering how it got to this point.
How? A strong dose of denial followed by increasing tolerance, if not acceptance, of a culture proven to be violently antithetical to ours.
No, their ban will be against Trump, you know, because the Brits don’t want someone who speaks “hate” and hurts muslims’ feelings. What a bunch of imbeciles.
Bye Britain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.