Posted on 01/03/2016 5:07:32 AM PST by Greetings_Puny_Humans
That is true....but your finding did not include the irony is the statement “mainstream Christians” - etc.....I simply added the imbedded irony.
This is not news/activism.
...how about an expose on the mainstream Presbyterian USA Church - and it’s far left radical liberal orthodoxy that borders on atheism???
in the evolution of Christianity, only the fittest will survive
Well, that pretty much condemns 99 percent of posters here who don't use their real names. But if anybody wants to know my real name, just send me a private message. I have nothing to hide, and am not afraid of some weirdo coming for me. Well, unless you and your gay co-worker from Breitbart, Milo, sneak up on me while I'm in the shower.
True. A true news story, or a legit opinion column, includes the name of who wrote it. Otherwise, it's just a rant by another anonymous internet troll ashamed to attach his/her real name to his/her words.
CUE gunner....
They exist, and you will find them mostly among "Charismatic" Catholics.
IIRC, he said “mainstream Christian conservatives” - which is an entirely different animal.
.
You mean such as the “rightwingwatch” link? OK.
This is basically a vanity post made by someone who
also apparently sees no difference in posting comments
and pretending to write “articles”.
Takes all kinds, I guess.
This crap belongs in “Chat”.
I'm so glad you stepped right into my trap. But you're wrong....because 99 per cent to get snotty assed and don't post "columns." It's one thing to discuss this or that under a screen name...but it's quite another to do what you do and still hide gutlessly. And since you'll only reveal "privately" - that is of course no revelation at all.
Now I love your continued attacks on and ignorance of Breitbart. Most of the sites authors never see each other - I'm probably 3000 miles away from Milo - as I think he's in California but I'm not sure. And Breitbart has been extraordinarily supportive of Trump - more so than of any other candidate - both it's authors and it's commenters. So you continue to demonstrate ignorance, gutlessness, and irrelevance.
Hahahaha!
I am a “mainstream christian conservative.” I support Cruz.
So, all of Cruz’s endorsers and supporters are religious wackos. Gotcha.
It was a rather pathetic trap, you have to admit.
What radicalism would that be, specifically.
+1
Well said.
I like Ted Cruz - he’ll make a great Vice President - but *if* there really are solid connexions between him and the Dominionists...that really is a problem, regardless of how much his supporters on FR want to screech and caterwaul.
Dominionism is not authentic biblical Christianity. It has several problems, largely related to its confusion of Old Testament blessings with New Testament promises, which then bear out into a plethora of weird doctrines, ranging from Old Testament law keeping to the “home church” movement to prosperity “gospel.” The one thing that unites them is the general belief that the government needs to be controlled by Christians, usually in the sense of “establishing the OT law as the law of the land.”
I can’t say if Ted Cruz is wrapped up in all that or not. His recent “don the full armour of God” rhetoric may just be tubthumping to whip up Iowa evangelicals ahead of the caucus. But if he is associated with that realm of doctrine...it’s troublesome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.