Wow ... your sure do twist stuff around.
We disagree about this incident. I think these guys who were convicted of starting a fire were in the wrong and should serve time. Even *they* are willing to serve time for their actions.
The Bundy boys are outside agitators and are not there to do anything but stir up trouble. I do not believe the Bundys will find too many locals to support them w/ this ill conceived plan. IMO ... the Bundys picked the wrong incident in the wrong place.
Wow ... your sure do twist stuff around.We disagree about this incident. I think these guys who were convicted of starting a fire were in the wrong and should serve time. Even *they* are willing to serve time for their actions.
The Bundy boys are outside agitators and are not there to do anything but stir up trouble. I do not believe the Bundys will find too many locals to support them w/ this ill conceived plan. IMO ... the Bundys picked the wrong incident in the wrong place.
Please take the time and make the effort to quote what you are talking about. At this point, with so many random non-directed replies it is impossible to unravel. I always go the extra mile to be specific and quote fully, it is the least to be expected in time-staggered conversation.
If you are replying to #256 then you just breezed through it without understanding. I was asking what form of "read" was in the sentence ( rhymes with 'deed' or 'red' ? ) as it was pivotal to understanding you. I was actually trying to understand you, unlike yourself who didn't return the courtesy.
I then assumed you meant "read" ( rhymes with 'deed' ) which would imply you will not look at stuff beyond court documents. Fine, your choice. But just say that, admit you don't care what the story is here and merely care what the FedGov crooks have slipped past the court.