Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz enlightened, forward-thinking on ethanol
Carroll Iowa Daily Times Herald ^ | 12/24/2015 | Dave VanderGriend

Posted on 12/30/2015 5:05:11 PM PST by iowamark

The recent editorial by Douglas Burns on the Texas connection between Ted Cruz and Congressman Steve King missed the mark on several important points as it relates to ethanol.

Senator Cruz’ opposition to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) is, as the author points out, based on “ideological rigidity, an unbudging conservatism and refusal to break from his own established boundaries of where the government should and shouldn’t go.” Does that make him anti-ethanol? I suppose if the RFS was the sole measuring stick, then perhaps.

But a fundamental misunderstanding regarding Cruz is the accusation that he completely dismisses ethanol and has not taken the time to understand it. Mr. Burns states the senator won’t even meet with industry leaders. As an Iowa native directly involved in the industry and having built many of the plants in Iowa, I have had numerous personal meetings with Senator Cruz in an effort to get him to support ethanol. From those meetings a different picture emerges, and it is not the anti-ethanol demon he has been cast as.

Anti-RFS? Yes.

Anti-ethanol? Not at all.

Anyone who thinks the two are inseparable may not be seeing the big picture for ethanol, or understand what is really going to determine our fate.

In fact, I have had numerous positive discussions with the senator helping him to see that the real challenge for ethanol is getting access to the consumer through a fair and open market.

The RFS began that process to some degree, but the true obstacles lie within the Environmental Protection Agency and the regulatory roadblocks they have put before us. Mr. Burns’ observation that Senator Cruz has a vision of what the government should and shouldn’t do is accurate, but at the same time Senator Cruz has agreed that the government shouldn’t limit our access to the market through unfair and arbitrary regulations. Similarly, he opposes oil subsidies and is pushing for their elimination.

Eliminating unreasonable and unfair caps on the blend rate. Removing government restrictions that artificially limit market demand for E15 and E30 blends. Ending Catch-22 regulations that nonsensically prevent mid-level blends from serving as test fuels. These are all ideas Cruz has indicated a willingness to work with us on.

The fact of the matter is that the RFS is not going to drive demand from here on.

We are at 96 percent of the allowable volume for corn ethanol under the RFS, and we simply must create new values and pathways.

All we want to do is be able to compete in a free market and allow the consumer to choose the fuels they would like.

The RFS from here on does nothing to ensure that.

Eliminating the regulations that are holding us back opens a market three times bigger than the RFS, and I submit that Senator Cruz just may be the most enlightened, forward-thinking ally ethanol has.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; canada; canadian; cruz; election2016; ethanol; ineligible; iowa; rfs; rfsra; steveking; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: iowamark

The use of ethanol should be a choice not a mandate!

(Personally, I choose Irish ethanol.)


21 posted on 12/30/2015 5:39:43 PM PST by JJ_Folderol (Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
" allow the consumer to choose the fuels they would like. "

Gas for my SI IC engines, Ethanol for medicinal purposes.

22 posted on 12/30/2015 5:46:48 PM PST by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Rheumatiz med'cin.


23 posted on 12/30/2015 5:49:44 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I don’t want ethanol in gasoline anywhere near my small power equipment (principally chainsaws). As a result I’m paying over $10/gallon for 98 octane non-ethanol fuels.


24 posted on 12/30/2015 5:55:17 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Despotism to liberalism: from Tiberius to Torquemada, and back again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
All we want to do is be able to compete in a free market and allow the consumer to choose the fuels they would like.

Sounds good. Free market. Conservatism. Liberty.


25 posted on 12/30/2015 5:59:31 PM PST by FourPeas (Chocolate, sugar and lots of caffeine. Hard to beat that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Great, I agree completely. So, when will Cruz stand up and demand an end to subsidies to the oil and gas industry?


26 posted on 12/30/2015 6:01:28 PM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
It'll be a "graduated reduction in subsidies" before all is said and done because that's the kind of deals lawyers make, not outright ending of such things. And that with the mandate that automotive gasoline continue to contain 15% ethanol remaining in effect.

So, yes, it'll be interesting.

27 posted on 12/30/2015 6:05:56 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

With oil so cheap, ethanol subsidies are a terrible waste.


28 posted on 12/30/2015 6:30:07 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in "Idiocracy," example of today's politico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
"So, when will Cruz stand up and demand an end to subsidies to the oil and gas industry?"

Oh, any minute now. /sarc

29 posted on 12/30/2015 6:52:01 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin; bigbob

https://www.tedcruz.org/news/cruz-campaign-welcomes-americas-renewable-futures-endorsement-of-cruz-tax-plan/

Excerpt: “We appreciate America’s Renewable Future’s [ethanol advocate group] focus on fairness and market competition and welcome their endorsement of Ted Cruz’s Simple Flat Tax Plan which eliminates all energy subsidies....”

“His plan eliminates all loopholes, stops corporate welfare, and specifically allows every company, including ethanol producers, to immediately expense all of their capital costs, treating everyone fairly, without subsidy. Ted Cruz believes the tax code shouldn’t pick winners or losers in the market and that all industries should compete on a level playing field.”

...Cruz spokeswoman Catherine Frazier fired back: “Cruz has consistently supported ending subsidies across all energy sectors, and his tax plan would do just that.”

“All that remains in terms of subsidies/exemptions in his tax plan are the Child Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit, as well as existing deductions for charitable contributions and mortgage interest payments”, she said.

...”Cruz’s tax plan also allows every company, including ethanol producers, to immediately expense all of their capital costs — treating everyone fairly, without subsidy.”


30 posted on 12/30/2015 7:02:43 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Yeah, they may be the worlds producer of corn based ethanol,but corn is not a good plant to use for it. The return on investment is poor. Time to change to switch grass and other high yield sugar plants. Besides when corn was introduced and picked as a winner by the USG the price of corn went up 400% because of scarcity and price fixing. Time to get off the government money train and allow corn to feed us not drive us.


31 posted on 12/30/2015 7:10:18 PM PST by Liaison (TANSTAAFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
And end the EPA dictate that gasoline for vehicles contain 15% ethanol ?

Didn't see that, plus, what Ted endorses and what Ted will settle for are two entirely different things, just like his being against TPP but advocating TPA which makes it much, much, easier to pass TPP.

Ted's a lawyer, he'll behave and horse trade just like a lawyer if President. What he does for PR reasons in his first (still incomplete) term in the Senate as a springboard to the Whitehouse is no indication of what he'd do in office.

You want Ted, fine with me, but I've had enough of elite Eastern university trained attorneys who give good speech and don't deliver a damn thing. Congress is full of them.

People were head over heels in love with a lot of those Congress critters when it was speech making time, too. Now ? They behave just like the lawyers they are willing to go along to get along with whoever has the money to pay them.

32 posted on 12/30/2015 7:12:47 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mears

bfl


33 posted on 12/30/2015 7:15:50 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Iceman Cometh
So he supports ethanol and he doesn’t. Graaaaaate.....

Idiot! You can piss in my tank if it will work and I don't have to subsidize it. Were you born brain dead?

34 posted on 12/30/2015 7:17:38 PM PST by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Liaison
Build a plant in the South that converts Kudzu to ethanol and it would probably have a much better ROI than corn does. Burning corn as fuel raises the price of all meat products which is probably half the reason why liberal azzholes love the idea of ethanol from corn.
35 posted on 12/30/2015 7:30:09 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Ethanol ruins your engine if it is in too long. I just saw an engine that sat too long with four stuck intake valves.


36 posted on 12/30/2015 7:31:23 PM PST by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I think the subsidy has long since expired.


37 posted on 12/30/2015 7:41:35 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtrott
Ethanol should have to compete on the free market. Sink or swim.

I believe the subsidy has expired.

IMO, corn is for food, not energy.

I doubt you eat hybrid feed-corn. Now they feed the spent mash to livestock, and claim the processed meal is more nutritious than the cracked corn.

So now they get two products, alcohol and cattle feed.

38 posted on 12/30/2015 7:46:52 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin
Burning corn as fuel raises the price of all meat products

So, why did beef triple while pork is still cheap? Cattle and hogs both consume corn.

39 posted on 12/30/2015 7:49:56 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER; iowamark
I think the subsidy has long since expired.

The ethanol subsidy has expired.

But the EPA-enforced Replacement Mandate remains in place. And ethanol is presently more expensive than gasoline, plus requires more expensive handling -- shipment by truck or RR, rather than pipeline, for blending at distribution terminal (due to its hygroscopic nature).

40 posted on 12/30/2015 7:51:55 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson