Skip to comments.
A real-life horror story: You are a felon and you didn't even know it
Fox News.com ^
| December 29, 2015
| Greg Glod
Posted on 12/30/2015 5:41:36 AM PST by Kaslin
Krister Evertson is the type of person we all strive to be: Eagle Scout, National Honor Society member, worker with the deaf and hearing impaired, and all-around law-abiding citizen.
Krister sold raw sodium, which is perfectly legal and used in variety of applications. Raw sodium must be shipped by ground transportation, not through the air. Unbeknownst to Krister, even when he checked off "ground" on the shipping label, UPS may ship by air.
Krister was arrested at gunpoint. He was found not guilty, but the government wouldn't stop there. After spending $430,000 in tax dollars, the government subsequently tried and convicted Krister for abandoning the "toxic" materials he clearly and carefully stored under another's supervision. Krister spent nearly two years in federal prison.
Krister's story is no far-fetched exception to some arcane law. Thousands of law-abiding citizens have been convicted under the more than 300,000 federal provisions, most of them administrative -- in other words not passed by Congress -- that carry a criminal penalty.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: felon; felonies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 next last
To: Elsie
I research it so you don’t have to!
101
posted on
12/30/2015 8:52:32 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: tacticalogic
Note the year.
It was thought to be attracting UFOs.
102
posted on
12/30/2015 8:53:05 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: tacticalogic
Why would you want to get rid of perfectly good sodium? Early MythBuster programming...
103
posted on
12/30/2015 8:54:02 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Alberta's Child
Different bogus charge, thus double jeopardy did not attach.
104
posted on
12/30/2015 8:57:47 AM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: Kaslin
There is a simple fix for this sort of problem: Congress and each of the several states need to pass statutes requiring that there must be a showing of mens rea before criminal charges can apply to violations of regulations or other "administrative law".
105
posted on
12/30/2015 9:00:50 AM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
To: diogenes ghost
Uhhh, noooo. Alaska Airlines, for one, operates 'combi' aircraft - half cargo, half passenger. The information I found when I researched UPS passenger flights said they did experiment with passenger flights, but due to FAA regs, did not take passengers other than UPS flight crew members on those flights. Apparently the experiment didn't pan out and they have discontinued those flights.
106
posted on
12/30/2015 9:01:39 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Hulka
Yes, But it was UPS. Shipper is still responsible. They also charged him with improper storage.
To: Elsie
Early MythBuster programming... Meh.
I still miss Junkyard Wars.
108
posted on
12/30/2015 9:04:18 AM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: mad_as_he$$
Wow.
You pay for a service (ground) and then the shipping company decides to send via air without asking you, and you are responsible?
Wow.
109
posted on
12/30/2015 9:12:41 AM PST
by
Hulka
To: tacticalogic
Too many FAA regs regarding operation of the aircraft.
Easy for a dual use aircraft but FAA makes it unworkable.
110
posted on
12/30/2015 9:13:48 AM PST
by
Hulka
To: BBB333
I appreciate the description, as I had no idea.
(I was thinking something along the lines of simple table salt).
111
posted on
12/30/2015 9:15:10 AM PST
by
Hulka
To: Alberta's Child
If this guy was tried and convicted, then the government managed to convince twelve jurors of his guilt. ===
This guy was aquitted at his first trial.
Then the feds brought more charges. Fed lawyers and prosecuters, funded with unlimited money, make specific charges, and very limiting jury instructions.
So these second charges were found guilty.
112
posted on
12/30/2015 10:09:45 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
To: Quality_Not_Quantity
He left the rest in storage as he fought the charges.
When he was acquitted, the feds claimed that the stored stuff had been abandoned.
113
posted on
12/30/2015 10:28:10 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
To: mkjessup
That would be Randy Weaver.
114
posted on
12/30/2015 10:28:57 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(Using 4th keyboard due to wearing out the "/" and "s" on the previous 3)
To: tacticalogic
Oh YEAH!
That was cool; too!
(And looked like the lot out behind my barn!)
115
posted on
12/30/2015 10:31:20 AM PST
by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
To: Kaslin
If there’s one thing the government IS good at it’s collecting money. They are relentless in their pursuit of a buck. It’s the ONLY way they can thrive since they build or make nothing. The questionable services they provide are hopelessly on a loss curve. Therefore the ONLY way they can fund them is to collect money through taxes, fines, tariffs and other similar revenue streams.
116
posted on
12/30/2015 10:36:53 AM PST
by
DouglasKC
(I'm pro-choice when it comes to lion killing....)
To: mad_as_he$$
No he went to jail for shipping the sodium via air. Would you want your family on an aircraft that was transporting sodium? BTW he needs to sue UPS if indeed the packages were labeled correctly. EPA and DOT rules and regulations make it the shipperâs responsibility to insure no violations occur but UPS seems to be at fault if they didnât inform him that aircraft would be used in âgroundâ shipments. More behind the story stuff:I don't think merely marking it as a ground shipment would be enough. Ground just means he's paying a cheaper rate. It might go by air if that's more convenient for the shipper. I think he has to inform UPS he's shipping a hazardous substance, and it can't travel by air. If he did that, than no problem, If he just marked ground shipping, I think he should be in trouble.
117
posted on
12/30/2015 10:50:50 AM PST
by
sharkhawk
(Here come the Hawks, the mighty Black Hawks)
To: Kaslin
My question is why didnât they go after UPS? The guy clearly marked ground but they ignored his request and shipped it per air anyway, knowing probably what was in it.The question is did he mark it as hazardous material? I'm sure UPS would charge more for that, vs. just a ground package. If he just asked for ground delivery, than UPS might ship it by air if it was more convenient.
118
posted on
12/30/2015 10:54:21 AM PST
by
sharkhawk
(Here come the Hawks, the mighty Black Hawks)
To: tacticalogic
The article implies that in this case UPS did ship itDid UPS know he was shipping sodium?
119
posted on
12/30/2015 10:55:28 AM PST
by
sharkhawk
(Here come the Hawks, the mighty Black Hawks)
To: Scrambler Bob
That would be Randy Weaver.
Right you are! Chester and the entire cast of Gunsmoke would not have stood for any of that craziness!
(wow, Dennis Weaver's family killed by government agents, who knew?) ;)
120
posted on
12/30/2015 10:56:13 AM PST
by
mkjessup
(JimRob: "It's Trump or Cruz, all the others are amnesty pimps" And the man is RIGHT!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-135 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson