Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: X-spurt

I confess that your comment at #9 confuses me.

I merely wish to agree with the point that some food does not contain DNA.


14 posted on 12/23/2015 6:39:58 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Some components of some food may indeed not have DNA, but any ingredient derived from a living animal or plant will have DNA.

There could be some things such as 100% petroleum based artificial edible products without DNA, but is that truly a food?

Purely mineral and without DNA would probably not be good to eat as a food by itself.

The confusion may be in the meaning of food.


19 posted on 12/23/2015 10:49:59 AM PST by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson