The proof of my thesis is that Ted Cruz has no legislation passed of any significance with his name as sponsor, during his 3 years in senate. I again agree that really good senators are very few. But we have to play with the cards dealt. We can’t manufacture 60 senators of our liking.
Would you expect him to, given that he has called out the Senate leadership -- exposing their lies and corruption.
Of course, he's going to be taken to Coventry by the leadership.
But has he not performed a greater service than if he had authored some legislation allocating tax dollars to this project or that program?
Taking Cruz to task for a lack of legislative achievements is like criticizing the Oscar winner's wardrobe choice.