Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron

The tobacco companies made the supreme mistake of thinking that they could compromise with their critics and put the issue to rest. Once they smelled weakness though their opponents repeated drove to the hoop.

Gun owners and the NRA watched and learned.


16 posted on 12/16/2015 7:26:18 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Buckeye McFrog
There is a huge difference between tobacco and firearms. Tobacco companies were selling a product that had no real practical value, and once the detrimental health effects were documented they knew it was only a matter of time before people would stop buying it anyway.

Interestingly, it seems like many of the places with the strongest anti-tobacco laws were the ones where hardly anyone smoked anyway. I remember when the Metrodome in Minneapolis was first considering a smoking ban back in the early 1990s -- before the city or state had ever regulated smoking in public places. They spent a lot of timing agonizing over this "controversial" measure, until someone suggested they do a survey of the fans of the sports teams that played there. It turns out that the smoking ban wasn't just non-controversial, it was also pointless ... because you could walk around Minneapolis, St. Paul and the surrounding suburbs for days and never see a single person smoking a cigarette.

19 posted on 12/16/2015 9:27:12 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson