SO “believes” in the second amendment but not in the fourth or fifth.
I am a gun owner who thinks people like Rep. Thompson suck.
New narrative! Dems will trot out real gun owners to support gun control! Just like the Rush seminars callers who served in the military but opposed the War on Terror.
He’s telling everyone straight up that he doesn’t believe in due process. He is in favor of tyranny. He’s not qualified to hold office but I don’t expect his constitutionally ignorant constituents to understand why.
That's what passes as a gun owner now days:)
People with common Anglo names are on those no fly lists, and everyone who shares that same name.
At the airport, those people still fly. They just get extra intrusive and time-consuming poking, proding, and degradations.
It’s just another way for the lefties to grab guns from innocent people with no accountability or due process.
A little government here and a little government there, and pretty soon you have Lois Lerner running the decision office on who gets to do what. What could possibly go wrong?
right. a list without due process. nothing but a political weapon.
Dunce. As Trump would say, “We have really stupid people leading us.”
A Democrat who owns guns, is against others doing the same - again, I say, "THIS IS NEWS?
"I would also like to take this opportunity to let my fellow Americans know that Freedom is Slavery, War is Peace, and Ignorance is Strength."
I consider people who say they “strongly believe” in the Second Amendment but are willing to support the communists’ and Nazis’ “camel’s nose” gun control laws as being mentally challenged and should not own a gun.
So suck it.
OUTSTANDING posts. Another agenda-driven, representative-enabled POS in CONgre$$. Who’da thunkit?
Then let’s take YOUR guns away, Rep Thompson, and see how you like gun control then!
Of course this removes Constitutional rights from thousands of innocent citizens. Ted Kennedy was on the list as we all laughed about. If they want to remove Constitutional rights for arbitrary and capricious reasons, why not ban Democrats, Blacks and Muslims from owning guns? It might be unconstitutional, but at least it would be more effective.
The only reason that I can think of that politicians come up with **** like this is that they are clueless about how to fix the problems (mostly, problems that they caused) and need to "do something" that sounds good to the Low Information Voters that elected them.
Without due process of course. How did you get on it and what are you suspected of? How do you get off the list?
One way to get on one of these lists is to have the same first Name, same middle initial and common surname as a guy married to a foul mouthed drunk, who insults anyone she comes in contact with. She gets banned and her husband gets on a serious watch list, and so do those with a the same names and similar age.
Another way seems to be sexist. Women married to guys who commit serious white collar crimes without any knowledge of the crimes are automatically on the list in spite of zero abetting. Then, those who get a divorce and change their surname back to their maiden names can find themselves on
a no fly or warning list.
So what you’re saying in so many words Mr. Thomson is that you’re an idiot?
When the Supremes maintain the ‘no fly list’ I’ll consider it and then reject it.
Thompson is a liar or he is a nut.