Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rubbery statistics (Lies used to spread the homosexual agenda)
Mercatornet ^ | 12/10/15 | Michael Cook

Posted on 12/11/2015 10:33:22 AM PST by wagglebee

“All Of Us” is an education pack about homosexuality and transexuality for teachers of Australian children in Years 7 and 8. Launched last month, it is supposed to help students be aware of bullying and discrimination and to affirm the identities of their LGBT classmates.

It is a comprehensive resource, with videos, posters, student hand-outs, and a unit guide for teachers – all painting a positive, if not glowing, view of the LGBT minority.

However, the statistics on the size of that minority – the crucial figures which justify the very existence of the program, are wrong.

First of all, what proportion of the population is same-sex attracted?

On page 8 of the booklet for teachers, it states very clearly that "10% of people are same-sex attracted". This is supported by Footnote 9, which refers the reader to a monograph, the 5th national survey of Australian secondary students and sexual health, published by the Australian Research Centre in Sex Health and Society at La Trobe University.

However, nowhere does the 10% statistic appear in the reference. So what is its source? On page 23, the La Trobe University survey states that "a proportion (6% overall: 8% boys, 4% girls) reported being attracted exclusively to people of the same sex". In addition, 4% (4% boys and 5% girls), were unsure about their sexual attraction. It appears that the 10% figure may have been reached by adding those who were exclusively attracted to those who were unsure.

Similarly, on page 8 of the booklet for teachers, it is stated emphatically that "around 4% are gender diverse or transgender". This is supported by Footnote 4, which refers the reader to a publication called The health and wellbeing of New Zealand secondary school students in 2012. This statistic does not appear in this publication. In fact, on page 25, the reference states that "About 1% of students reported that they were transgender" and “approximately 3% were not sure”. Once again, the target statistic appears to have been reached by adding the percentage of those with a clear idea about their sexuality to those who were questioning.

If this is correct, what does it imply about the aim of the “All Of Us” program? That all children who are puzzled about their sexual identity will choose to live as homosexuals or transgender? That the alluring images of the LGBT lifestyle in “All Of Us” will be a kind of reverse conversion therapy?

The Safe Schools Coalition needs to explain how it got its figures so wrong.

One explanation may be its highly unprofessional research methods. The “All Of Us” study guide says that the figures are based on "Australian and international research". This is nonsense. The two footnotes are just reports based on rough-and-ready surveys, not peer-reviewed journals.

The authors of the Australian study done at La Trobe University even acknowledged that they had significant difficulty in recruiting enough students in Years 10, 11 and 12. “Obtaining the necessary sample of students has been more difficult to achieve with each iteration of this research project,” they wrote. To increase student participation, they resorted to an online survey through networks which had an interest in student sexuality and through Facebook. Online surveys are notoriously inaccurate.

Figures about the LGBT population are always going to be controversial. The Safe Schools Coalition could have used figures provided by the best-known LGBT think tank, the Williams Institute at UCLA Law School in California. It is “dedicated to conducting rigorous, independent research on sexual orientation and gender identity law and public policy”. Its fact sheet, “How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender?” is freely available. The author, Gary J. Gates, is a well-known American demographer specialising in LGBT issues whose work has been used in US Supreme Court cases. 

Surprisingly, Gates’ figures are far, far lower than those cited in the “All Of Us” program: “An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual and an estimated 0.3% of adults are transgender,” he writes.

If Gates is correct, the “All Of Us” figure for same-sex attracted people are about 180% too high and for transgender people about 1200% too high.

The teen years are a turbulent time for children. What they need to survive and thrive is the truth, not the propaganda in the “All Of Us” program.

* * * * * * *

LATE ADDITION: In response to queries from MercatorNet, a Safe Schools Coalition spokesperson explained how the statistics had been calculated:

In relation to your query about 10% of people being same sex attracted. The research referenced for this figure showed 6% overall reported an exclusive attraction to people of the opposite sex. A proportion of respondents also reported attraction to both sexes. 10% may actually be a conservative guide based on this research and has been used in consultation with authors of the research.

In relation to your query about 4% of people being gender diverse or transgender. This figure includes both gender diverse and transgender people. This research referenced in this section found that about 96% of respondents reported that they were not transgender. The remainder reported that they were either transgender or not sure of their gender.

Michael Cook is editor of MercatorNet. 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
However, the statistics on the size of that minority – the crucial figures which justify the very existence of the program, are wrong.

The ENTIRE homosexual agenda is based upon lies.

1 posted on 12/11/2015 10:33:23 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 12/11/2015 10:34:00 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“An estimated 3.5% of adults in the United States identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual...”

Not according to my tv and all the movies now-a-days. You’d think they were 30-40%.


3 posted on 12/11/2015 10:35:23 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
If 10% of CHILDREN are same-sex attracted, then 10% of children have been sexually abused.
4 posted on 12/11/2015 10:46:17 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This tactic is routinely used by those who promote the homosexual agenda. These lies are repeated so often that even some of those who should know better accept them without question.


5 posted on 12/11/2015 10:50:49 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; wagglebee; savagesusie

If 10% of CHILDREN are same-sex attracted, then 10% of children have been sexually abused.””

Exactly the key to the locked door of truth. The perverts with the help of homowood spent the last 3 decades erecting this locked door.


6 posted on 12/11/2015 11:14:05 AM PST by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

You can legalize it, rationalize it and justify it but just as it was when I took Soc 1000 in 1973 it is still deviant.


7 posted on 12/11/2015 11:39:22 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

The phrase intellectual phase locking comes to mind. The people responsible for most TV and movies have a desire to be edgy and relevant and as a result they project outward from their bubbles. Some are active propagandists, to be sure; but, not all have to be.

In the end though there’s not a dimes worth of difference between the propagandists and the sheep since both are selling the same bad goods.


8 posted on 12/11/2015 11:49:14 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phlap

What you you expect? The left seems to define “progress” by whatever culture is doing at the moment. If you are resisting change in even the least way, or even not changing fast enough for the avant guard, you’re anything from backwards, a bigot, or outright the enemy.

So very many are like the Clevers from Lewis’ The Pilgrim’s Regress, and that’s not a good thing.


9 posted on 12/11/2015 11:55:47 AM PST by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I see they’re still lying about the high percentages.


10 posted on 12/11/2015 1:31:51 PM PST by Trillian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson