Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The speech where Adolf Hitler declared war on the USA, 1941
www.rarehistoricalphotos.com ^

Posted on 12/11/2015 6:00:13 AM PST by equaviator

On December 11, 1941, several days after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor and the United States declaration of war against the Japanese Empire, Nazi Germany declared war on the United States, in response to what was claimed to be a series of provocations by the United States government when the US was formally neutral during World War II.

The decision to declare war was made almost entirely by Adolf Hitler, without consultation. Hitler had received no advance notice from the Japanese about the attack on Pearl Harbor. Although he and his Foreign Minister Ribbentrop had verbally indicated a willingness to join Japan in war against America however it broke out, Hitler had absolutely no formal treaty obligation to declare war on the United States. Such a treaty had in fact been drafted and circulated in the weeks prior to Pearl Harbor, but it remained unsigned.

The bombing of Pearl Harbor surprised even Germany. Although Hitler had made an oral agreement with his Axis partner Japan that Germany would join a war against the United States, he was uncertain as to how the war would be engaged. Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor answered that question. On December 8, Japanese Ambassador Oshima went to German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop to nail the Germans down on a formal declaration of war against America. Von Ribbentrop stalled for time; he knew that Germany was under no obligation to do this under the terms of the Tripartite Pact, which promised help if Japan was attacked, but not if Japan was the aggressor. Von Ribbentrop feared that the addition of another antagonist, the United States, would overwhelm the German war effort.

Hitler assumed that war with the United States was inevitable. He was completely right. The USA was neutral in name only at that point and was going to join the war on Britain's side sooner or later. So Hitler decided that the best move would be to declare war on the USA in December 1941 both to show solidarity with the Japanese/strengthen the ties of the Axis and to hit the USA right after their Pacific fleet had been dealt a massive (though crucially not a crippling) blow. What Hitler got wrong (which was the exact same thing that the Japanese high command got wrong) was he completely underestimated the production power of the United States as well as the country's willingness to shift the vast majority of that production over to wartime needs.

Regardless of Hitler's reasons for the declaration, the decision is generally seen as an enormous strategic blunder on his part, as it allowed the United States to enter the European war in support of the United Kingdom and the Allies without much public opposition, while still facing the Japanese threat in the Pacific.

Interesting facts:

-The speech to the Reichstag was originally planned for December 10, but it was delayed for a day so the German and Italian Embassies in Washington had time to burn their cables.

-Hitler's declaration of war came as a great relief to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, who feared the possibility of two parallel disconnected wars (UK and Soviet Union versus Germany in Europe, US versus Japan in the Pacific). With Nazi Germany's declaration against the United States in force, American assistance for Britain in both theaters of war as a full ally was assured.

-The reason Hermann Goering's chair is bigger is because he was Reichstagspresident which means president of the Reichstag. In this position it was his duty to overwatch discussions and such, that's why he's sitting above the others. It is similar to how the US House is set up during State of the Union, with the Speaker and Vice-President (who serves as President of the Senate) sitting behind the President, and in normal days whoever is presiding officer would be seated there. It's a standard for Parliaments and Congresses.

-The eagle background is quite a feat, its sharp edges and predatory posture impose power, discipline, order and fear. Everything Nazi was basically made to impress and especially to intimidate. Selling an image is easier than selling an ideology, especially in the environment Germany was in during that time.


TOPICS: Germany; Miscellaneous; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: 1941; 194112; 19411211; axispowers; germany; history; italy; japan; worldwareleven; ww2; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2015 6:00:14 AM PST by equaviator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Look at the body language and facial expressions on those listening.


2 posted on 12/11/2015 6:06:07 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Incredible photo. Thanks.


3 posted on 12/11/2015 6:06:12 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Question: What differentiated those wearing the red Nazi armband from those not?


4 posted on 12/11/2015 6:07:26 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

I’ve sat through this a couple of time, and each time it just gets more and more bizarre. Even many Nazis were a bit perplexed as to why Hitler would even do this, and honestly it sounds like he was more rambling for an answer himself.

It seems like Adolf thought his winning streak was so good, that this would just be another easy enemy.


5 posted on 12/11/2015 6:07:30 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Bookmark


6 posted on 12/11/2015 6:07:51 AM PST by Mercat ("[T]he Kingdom of heaven suffers violence, and the violent are taking it by force." Matthew 11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Not all military were members of the Nazi party. Perhaps the difference?


7 posted on 12/11/2015 6:09:24 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wrench

They don’t look any too enthused.


8 posted on 12/11/2015 6:13:40 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrench

How do you say we’re screwed in German?


9 posted on 12/11/2015 6:14:34 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wrench

I think it was the Nazi party symbol at first.


10 posted on 12/11/2015 6:14:56 AM PST by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

Cabinet members?


11 posted on 12/11/2015 6:15:05 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist; equaviator

Joseph Goebbels can be seen in the left-most seat of the first row, in profile. He appears to be wearing an armband, but it’s hard to be sure.


12 posted on 12/11/2015 6:15:54 AM PST by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Whats FDR doing sitting in the front row? I knew he was involved. /s


13 posted on 12/11/2015 6:15:55 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateRightist

The “armband system” was instituted by the Nazi Party in 1939 at the same time that the political leadership ranks were expanded into their final form. The purpose of the armband system was to denote positional titles within the Nazi Party in contrast to a party member’s political rank.[1]

There were three groupings of armbands, classified as “operational”, “administrative”, and “command”. The operational armbands were used by Nazi Party political leaders on the local and county levels and were worn by those Party leaders directly engaged in implementing Party policies to the public. During World War II, this was most often associated with food rationing, war relief efforts, and civil defense.

The administrative armbands were worn by office staffs across all levels of the party, although mostly were used by the regional staffs of the Gauleiters. The third, and least common of the armbands, were the command armbands worn by the Deputy Gauleiters, Gauleiters, and Reichsleiters.

The Nazi Party armbands were intended for immediate implementation upon the outbreak of World War II in 1939, although it was not until 1943 that the system was in total effect. Even then, photographic evidence reveals it was not uncommon for some political leaders to simply wear the pre-1939 bare swastika armband, with some photographs as late as 1945 revealing political leaders failing to wear the appropriate Nazi positional armband.

By pairing up a wearer’s political collar tabs and armband, it was possible to determine exactly what their position and responsibilities were within the Nazi Party political leadership corps; the armband system was also used to differentiate between Party leaders who may have held the same political ranks, but were entrusted with vastly different responsibilities. For instance, a Hauptbereichsleiter who was serving as the Kreisleiter of a German county, would wear a more elaborate armband than a Nazi Party member of the same rank who was on the administrative staff of a Gauleitung.

On the local level of the Nazi Party, political armbands were often used to denote those Nazis holding the positions of Blockleiter and Zellenleiter. A further political position, unique only to the local level of the Nazi Party, was that of Betriebsobmann which was a type of Shop Steward position. At the top tier of the operational armbands was a unique armband worn by both the Ortsgruppenleiter and the Kreisleiter

Administrative armbands were used across all levels of the Nazi Party, beginning with the position of Mitarbeiter which was a catch all staff position encompassing a wide variety of duties. Mitarbeiter had itself been a political rank prior to 1939, after which time the rank was phased out of the Nazi Party but survived as a political position. Leadership administrative armbands were worn by Office Leaders (Amtsleiters and Stellenleiters), of which there were eight levels of hierarchy. In all, the Nazi political offices, denoted by special armbands, were as follows:

Hilfssachgebiet - Auxiliary Administrative Area
Sachgebiet - Administrative Area
Hilfsstelle - Auxiliary Area
Stelle - Area
Hauptstelle - Head Area
Amtes - Office
Hauptamtes- Head Office
Oberst Amtes - Supreme Office
A leader of a political office was known as a Leiter followed by the office name. For instance, Leiter eines Sachgebietes would indicate the leader of an administrative area office.

Command armbands matched up directly with the positions of Gauleiter and Reichsleiter, each of which was denoted by its own unique armband. The political position of Deputy Gauleiter (Stellvertreter Gauleiter) was phased out as a political rank in 1939 (explaining why there was no “one leaf” Gauleiter insignia during World War II), bur survived as a political armband denoting status as a Deputy Regional Leader.

Display of armbands at link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranks_and_insignia_of_the_Nazi_Party


14 posted on 12/11/2015 6:16:06 AM PST by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can�t avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.�)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: equaviator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niiiHjIQu8s
15 posted on 12/11/2015 6:16:18 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wrench

S.S. Officers had to members of the Nazi Party. I would be surprised if there wasn’t enormous pressure on high ranking members of the Wehrmacht. Speculation: Maybe those with Nazi armbands are SS?


16 posted on 12/11/2015 6:17:27 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: equaviator

Military men would have known they didn’t need yet another active enemy/front;attacking the Soviet Union was a huge mistake by Hitler.


17 posted on 12/11/2015 6:18:23 AM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wrench

Biggest mistake of Hitler. Even bigger than invading Russia.


18 posted on 12/11/2015 6:18:42 AM PST by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

Wir sind fooked?


19 posted on 12/11/2015 6:19:09 AM PST by gr8eman (Don't waste your energy trying to understand commies. Use it to defeat them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus

Wir sind verschraubt


20 posted on 12/11/2015 6:20:10 AM PST by wrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson