Posted on 12/09/2015 2:22:05 PM PST by Jeff Head
Well stated, Jeff. You made a perfect case.
Shut down muslim immigration 100% and begin an immediate process of expulsion of those muslims even remotely, REMOTELY connected with jihadi. Even the MOST REMOTE CONNECTION.
I would further this by cutting off ALL welfare to immigrants,,. PERIOD!!!
I like the well water analogy but he left out an important point.
The Obama administration is making you drink the unfiltered water.
Read Matt Brackens post at Gates of Vienna.
Tet Take Two.
http://gatesofvienna.net/2015/11/tet-take-two-islams-2016-european-offensive/
This is simply the most likely event for the foreseeable future.
My pastor can take an ordinary conversation or simple greeting and respond with scripture and a reason why he responded that way .. for instance
We all know these people ... some are very good friends BECAUSE they filter data through THEIR particular filter ... and we are grateful for their input
Donald trump's filter is idealistic, Norman Rockwellian with the added dash of pompous bravado usually associated with an arrogant American in a foreign land in the 1950's
We who remember that style of man ... and those that desire that style of man are naturally drawn to him BECAUSE of how he filters information ... and we are grateful for his input
Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
That pretty much is game, set, match regarding this issue. It never was an issue.
Read my Post 26
...in response to Laz. The issue never was an issue. Trump had it right the whole time...and I am sure he knows it.
I wonder what the response on Facebook (or DU) would be if someone posted that law, but said that it was a PROPOSED law by Trump or Cruz?
Well - I guess I know what the response would be, but would still be fun to watch their heads explode. Maybe I’ll just try it at home where my wife and one daughter thinks Trump has gone too far. The other daughter and myself ponder the idea.
Hehehe...I’ll by some popcorn, particularly in anticipation of your letting it go on a while, and then finally posting that it is already existing law!
LOL!
All of the media BS neglected to include the word “Temporary” when they jumped all over Trump for what he said. I believe he was only restating what someone else (not sure who that was) had stated earlier but the media dumped it all of Trump.
Let Traitor Roberts decide is Islam is Sedition or not.
Eagles Up !!
Let Congress declare that Islam is not a religion and SCOTUS can pound sand.
Good post Jeff.
I find it interesting that so many times Trump’s words
are blown all out of proportion to find out later
that there is a lot of sense to what he says.
I am a Cruz supporter as I feel he has a much fuller
grasp of the Constitutional aspects of governance.
Trump’s manner can be so overwhelming at times but
perhaps that is what is needed to roll back the
road to serfdom.
Glad you are doing ok.
t.
Oh, I know. I even posted the thread.
“If an individual espouses Sharia Law, they should not be allowed in.”
This pretty much closes the door to anyone from Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, & other countries governed by Sharia Law.
People from these countries know little or nothing about democracy & the rule of secular law. Sharia is the only law they know. To them, all other legal systems are corrupt.
Asking them to deny the only legal system they know is not gonna happen unless they lie - taqiyya. So, why bother asking them at all?
Bottom line for me: Mass immigration of people with a ideology totally foreign to US law & customs is a recipe for national legal, cultural suicide. If you are unsure of the consequences, ask any Native American.
The best, least objectionable solution is to block or make near impossible immigration from select countries: Syria, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iran, Qatar, & several others. Tell these countries that immigration will resume when they make substantial legal & religious reforms. Allow in only those who have credible US sponsors & hold the sponsors legally accountable for the actions of the immigrants for a period of years.
If anybody doubts it, they should simply look at the past 1400 years of mayhem and murder perpetrated by the followers of Mohammad on their unfortunate neighbors. There is nothing "peaceful" about them now and there never has been.
The only peaceful or tolerant Muslim is one who is either an apostate or one who does not follow the clear teachings of the Koran and other Muslim scriptures. In other words, one who is not a "true" Muslim. The more religious they are in following Mohammad, the more they are apt to cut your throat.
Very well done. Thank you.
The Founders flawed and should have put a cultural clause with regards to who comes in.
We’ve been paying the price in blood for “diversity” as has every foolish nation that has tolerated foreigners in the past.
Just to reiterarte the one very salint point:
Regarding the proposal by Trump to temporarily halt all Islamic entry into the United States, there is a lot of hype, misinformation, ignorance, and out and out lies being circulated in an attempt to slam Trump.
So, what is the truth of the matter? Is Trump's proposal illegal? Is his proposal un-Constitutional? Is his proposal un-American?
Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
This is in the U.S. Code of Laws. It was passed by Congress in 1952 and has been the law of the land ever since. And, by the way, at the time it was passed by a Democratic Congress.
So, to be clear, if the President determines that murders/killers/enemies are infiltrating any group of people to do harm to America, he has been given the power by Congress to stop or restrict that groups immigration or non-immigration status and ability to come into the country by proclamation. This is precisely what Trump has proposed…and for obvious reasons.
It is NOT un-American, it is U.S. Law.
It is NOT un-Constitutional, Article 6 Paragraph 3 of the U.S. Constitution regarding no religious test refers specifically and only to the election of Congress...not to immigration.
As President, Donald Trump would have full legal authority under U.S. Law to do exactly what he has proposed.
All of the hype, outrage, and statements to the contrary are either political grandstanding, abject ignorance of the law, or willful lies regarding the issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.