Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Workplace violence?

The Left is coming up with a new term for this: RADICALIZED.

As if, something external happened to the couple like a head cold out of their control.

It creates a false narrative that they weren't fully responsible for their action, that some outside force acted upon them, and, most important, that their position is somehow drastically different than the teachings of Islam.

1 posted on 12/08/2015 5:19:23 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: TigerClaws

and orwellian govt couldnt figure it out during that year.


2 posted on 12/08/2015 5:24:12 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

But But according to that liberal b*tch Linda Stasi, Farooq was just upset because one of the victims had a discussion with him two weeks prior about Islam being a religion of “Peace” well there ya go, they had this planned for a YEAR..and of course leftists LOVE the word “Radicalized” because it excuses the behavior of the Jihadists..its called ISLAM..were the 9/11 hijackers “Radicalized” NO, they were following Islam’s teachings, kill all infidels


3 posted on 12/08/2015 5:26:38 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

If society collapses will mosques be the target of choice?


4 posted on 12/08/2015 5:27:12 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik spent at least a year preparing for their terror attack, practicing at a local gun range

Hmmm, not sure if I am buying this one. Did she wear her burka or Hijab at the range? Sorry but if these two were going to a range on a regular basis, it would have drawn attention.

5 posted on 12/08/2015 5:27:58 PM PST by Michael.SF. (This tagline lists all of Hilary's accomplishments............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

7 posted on 12/08/2015 5:30:13 PM PST by JoeProBono (SOME IMAGES MAY BE DISTURBING ’VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pocat

bump


8 posted on 12/08/2015 5:32:27 PM PST by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

People are deemed to intend the natural consequences of their actions, at least in civilized countries.
So the responsibility is clear. But a lot of us would like to know who their accessories or enablers were:
http://scallywagandvagabond.com/2015/12/syed-farook-28-500-bank-deposit-2-weeks-before-shooting/
Who wired them $28,500 to help take care of their survivors? They were no better than suicide/murderer bombers.
I’m going to venture a guess that it was Wahabi fat cats, like American-Irish turds with money funding the IRA years ago. Fifteen of the nineteen 9-11-2001 skyjacker/mass murderers were Saudis.
Saudis are at the pinnacle of the Islamic world. It has been said that the Koran can only be properly understood read as written, in Arabic.
“But the Saudis are our friends!” Sure, like our friends the Pakis hid bin Ladin? Farook’s bitch was a Paki.

If a certain Saudi family or group is found to be responsible for assisting/inciting/enabling them, and President Trump or Cruz is apprised of it, I expect it won’t take him over 100 days to get off the pot—as it took Barry although he knew Osama’s precise location—and pull the trigger on JDAM strikes.
These sheet-wrapped bedouins have been nettling us for too long.


9 posted on 12/08/2015 5:34:50 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

Farooq’s sister was practicing there as well.


10 posted on 12/08/2015 5:36:50 PM PST by MNDude (God is not a Republican, but Satan is certainly a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
 photo Victims Photo Comp 01_zpsjxw52zi1.jpg
 photo Victims Photo Comp 02_zpssi45lh5r.jpg
13 posted on 12/08/2015 5:46:13 PM PST by ETL (Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better, safer America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
 
 
Yeah, and they still sucked - their "practice" obviously didn't prepare them for armed resistance and both died like little bitches.
 
 

14 posted on 12/08/2015 5:48:07 PM PST by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

As I’ve been saying, by all outward appearances, they were textbook, assimilated, “moderate Muslims.”

Until they weren’t.


15 posted on 12/08/2015 5:51:58 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

I have a fair question.....why didn’t anyone at the gun range find it perculiar that a muslim man and his bagged companion taking target practice at a gun range?


16 posted on 12/08/2015 6:01:36 PM PST by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws
The Left is coming up with a new term for this: RADICALIZED.

RADICALIZED just means they read the unholy Koran and decided to follow it instead of becoming apostates.

Both outcomes are possible. In the wake of 9/11, Ayaan Hirsi Ali read the Koran and concluded that it did indeed call for the sort of actions Atta and company had perpetrated. So, she abandoned the religion. And now the Left hates her.

17 posted on 12/08/2015 6:07:22 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

BUT THE FAMILY KNEW NOTHING, RIGHT?? SUUUUURE.....and Bill Clinton keeps his wedding vows.


18 posted on 12/08/2015 6:14:32 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

As with all things liberal, he who gets to control the meaning of words, gets to control the outcome of the debate.

Given all the explicit passages in the Koran that require a faithful Muslim to slay the infidels, what is the meaning of “radicalized”? I only know what I have read in the Koran and what I have observed.

It looks to me like the Muslims who gunned down so many people in San Bernardino last week were just following what the Koran tell them.

I looks to me like the Muslims who cannot bring themselves to commit such acts of violence upon the kifir and unclean idolaters is the one who is just a faithless slacker Muslim.

Based on what I read and see, who then is “radicalized”? It appears that the faithless slacker Muslims are just jealous of the faithful ones. Indeed, this was exactly what the chief ideologue of the Muslim Brotherhood said to his fellow Muslims and why Sayyid Qutb was so dangerous to civil life in Egypt. And why the Egyptian government eventually sentenced him to death.

Read it for yourself in Chapter 4 of his book Milestones.

http://www.khilafahbooks.com/wp-content/ebook/english/current1/Milestones_khilafahbooks_com.pdf


21 posted on 12/08/2015 6:25:03 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerClaws

This is a little much....thousands of people go to the gun range every week. All of us go to improve our skills and “muscle memory” safety. That they were at the range “practicing” fir the killing is something written by someone who has never been to a gun range,


30 posted on 12/08/2015 7:23:58 PM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

*


35 posted on 12/09/2015 4:44:15 AM PST by PMAS (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson