It doesn’t but it can be amended. I see no problem with banning people from problem countries...and probably much more doable than an all out ban on religion. I am not against Trump’s proposal and he’s on the right track with this. I’d extend a country ban to everyone in the middle east and African trouble spots. The problem will be catching radicals coming through Europe. It’s happening. For that reason, Trump’s approach is not far off. A counter argument is that we can fairly easily add more scrutiny to a small number of Europeans trying to get here. It’s a numbers game in the end.
I don’t agree with throwing the Christians in the Middle East to the lions just because we want to be “politically correct” and ban their entire country instead of the people who are the actual problem, the Muslims. This is like when Kim Davis refused to give licenses to regular couples just so she could avoid giving them to same-sex couples without looking like she was “discriminating.” That’s not the right solution. It’s the classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It is simply the right and moral thing to accept Christian or Jewish refugees who are being slaughtered by Muslims.