Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ilgipper

I don’t agree with throwing the Christians in the Middle East to the lions just because we want to be “politically correct” and ban their entire country instead of the people who are the actual problem, the Muslims. This is like when Kim Davis refused to give licenses to regular couples just so she could avoid giving them to same-sex couples without looking like she was “discriminating.” That’s not the right solution. It’s the classic case of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It is simply the right and moral thing to accept Christian or Jewish refugees who are being slaughtered by Muslims.


283 posted on 12/08/2015 11:19:49 AM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

No, we don’t need any more refugees who come here and vote Democrat to further the welfare state. I don’t care what their religion is, the American sense of freedom will cease to exist.

We help them in their countries. There are still plenty of Jews living in Arab countries who don’t emigrate to Israel. Why they do that is complex. They did get the remaining Syrian Jews out of Damascus.

What you are advocating is national suicide. America is supposed to be a beacon, and not turn into Sweden.


305 posted on 12/08/2015 11:39:48 AM PST by Read Write Repeat (Not one convinced me they want the job yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson