Somebody else has commented about this too .. and they suspected that it was because somebody the FBI knew .. may have been in the house .. and of course they did not want to have those fingerprints included.
However, that means that the “landlord” who let the people into the condo .. may have been that person. Certainly he would have a motive if he were that person. And, did he tell the FBI that before they went in .. just to keep them from taking fingerprints ..??
But, it was later broadcast that the FBI got what they wanted from the house; so they didn’t care that people were walking through it and trashing it. Some of the San Diego news people showed us that ammunition was left behind, and a lot of other harmful stuff. Why, I can only imagine. Of course, at the time of the raid, the FBI were not saying it was terrorism .. so maybe the evidence rules would have been different .. but for my money .. I can’t see a reason why the collection of evidence would be different if the crime were different.
Fast and Furious, Part 2?
Maybe it wasn’t enough for Holder and 0vomit to sell guns to Mexican drug lords because they weren’t getting the high profile gun disasters they were hoping for so they had to up the ante by selling them to islamic terrorists. More bang for the buck, so to speak.