Posted on 12/01/2015 3:01:16 AM PST by WhiskeyX
So?
Exactly!
...and she is still running for POTUS? Shameful COWARDS, ALL of them!!!!
Clinton's comment is intended to play to the gullible masses. She knows law enforcement will not engage in argumentation with her, thus, it will appear to some that she's made some point for which law enforcement has no counter.
Law enforcement and the courts know a violation would have occurred irrespective of how an email is marked. It's the classified info contained, not simply whether it's marked as secret or had such a physical designation removed by the time she sent it. Removing such a designation is also a violation, yet apparently happened a lot while such documents were in her care and that of her staff.
HF
the punishment for treason is death
What I haven’t read anything about is whether these emails were the 1) original ones which had to remain on secure government servers. Or whether they were 2) summaries or “copy and paste” versions which were sent to her (outside the secure government server) by State Dept. staffers.
Either way, what was done was a violation of the law. But they may have thought by doing 2), there was deniability.
Back on 8/19/15 as this was unfolding I made a prediction based on the released FBI data that roughly 5.1% or 1900 emails with classified information would be discovered. We’re well on our way...
She's tried deniability all over the place. Everything has been shown--over time--to have been false.
That she's not been formally charged and in jail is a black-eye for the Obama administration's justice system.
That's she still pretends to be a contending Democratic presidential nominee is a black stroke against that party. It shows that something other than the Constitution is at work in what the Left thinks correct.
If she or her party find a way for her to win the prize, there will be serious bloodshed, IMHO.
HF
It’s irrelevant how many emails had classified information.
What’s HIGHLY relevant is the content. If there is evidence of bribery and tax evasion (how can there not be), then all three of them are in deep doo-doo.
If these are technical violations only, no US Presidential candidate will ever be taken down for violating rule #22,736, and I’m not sure that the Justice Department SHOULD be empowered to disrupt an election in that way.
But she is a member of the elite ruling class and make no mistake she has some Rino cover in this ongoing saga.
Despite what most in the GOPe would have us believe.
The one-worlders are of the same clan...sometimes they just wear different colors.
WHY HASN”T SHE BEEN CHARGED?
WHY HAS SHE NOT BEEN PUT IN JAIL?
Thank God Trump says she should be in jail for wht she did, and says it now in every speech.
The people need to demand justice.
Hillary put our nation at risk by exposing sensitive and classified information on an unsecured server.
You would get fired at work for doing the same.
This is a billion times worse.
It’s up to Obama. He hates Hillary and Bill, but he wants the next President to be a Democrat, so he is stuck with Hillary since Biden chickened out. Obama can see to it that Hillary is not indicted. “Equal justice under law” is just an historical memory in this country.
Anyone who has ever handled classified information would think you are an idiot.
1
So where are the cuffs?
She is a member of the Uniparty oligarchy with FBI files on many. Nobody in DC will lay a glove on her. If truth be told this is the main reason so many of the ruling class is deathly afraid of Mr. Trump becoming president. He would go after her and all their dirty little secrets may come spilling out as well.
Out of all the presidential candidates (on either side) only Trump has even mentioned Hilary Clinton and her email scandal not to mention she should be in prison!
Ordinary rules do not apply to Her Royal Highness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.