Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RKBA Democrat
Something the article should have pointed out is that the actual "proposal" for the regulation admits that it may be a very bad idea, and that they seem to be requesting comments from the public who are similarly concerned, ostensibly so that the proposal can be killed:

The Treasury Department and the IRS are concerned about the potential risk for identity theft involved with donee reporting given that donees will be collecting donors' taxpayer identification numbers and maintaining those numbers for some period of time. The Treasury Department and the IRS request comments on whether additional guidance is necessary regarding the procedures a donee should use in soliciting and maintaining a donor's taxpayer identification number and address to mitigate the risk.

The actual text also states/claims that this proposal is motivated by taxpayers who have complained that getting a "contemporaneous written acknowledgment (CWA) from the donee organization" is inconvenient and that they would rather just reveal their social security numbers so that the need for the CWA can be eliminated.

22 posted on 11/29/2015 7:28:29 AM PST by snarkpup (The "Plague Syndrome": Immigrants fleeing their own culture who end up spreading it around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: snarkpup

“The actual text also states/claims that this proposal is motivated by taxpayers who have complained that getting a “contemporaneous written acknowledgment (CWA) from the donee organization” is inconvenient and that they would rather just reveal their social security numbers so that the need for the CWA can be eliminated.”

I call BS on that one.


24 posted on 11/29/2015 7:30:20 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: snarkpup

Saaaay. I think you’re right. This might well be in response to a “petition for rulemaking.” In this case maybe some gang of miscreants put in a request for this with the long term goal of suppressing charitable contributions. Atheists would find that particularly appealing due to the negative repercussions on churches.

Hard to believe but true: sometimes even the bureaucrats aren’t interested in the really stupid proposals. But they need some justification for saying NO.


29 posted on 11/29/2015 8:47:33 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Look closely at any evil and most times you'll find the unmistakable handprint of caesar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson