Please click on the pictures at the top of the columns for more details on the ratings of the candidates.
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Budget, Spending & Debt |  |
 |
|
| Civil Liberties | |
|
 |
| Education | |
|
|
| Energy & Environment | |
|
|
| Foreign Policy & Defense | |
|
|
| Free Market | |
|
|
| Health Care & Entitlements | |
|
|
| Immigration | |
|
|
| Moral Issues | |
|
|
| Second Amendment | |
|
|
| Taxes, Economy & Trade | |
|
|
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
Note: If you don't like the ratings for any reason, please contact Conservative Review's Editor-in-Chief, "The Great One," Mark Levin. But I have to warn you that you may get this response from him: "GET OFF THE PHONE, YOU BIG DOPE!"
Ted was my guy from the beginning.
Trump has done such a great service to this country by telling the truth and thereby draining the swamp and exposing the establishment.
For that Trump gets my full support.
Trump/Cruz is my ideal ticket.
Ted-yes.
Trump-yes.
RINObio-no.
Jeb-hell no!
The rebellion within.
Ted is also the only candidate who knows how all the branches of government need to work and had first hand experience with two of them - the Supreme Court and Congress.
Trump will make a great head of Dept of Commerce in a Cruz presidency.
In the last two presidential elections the voice on FR has been somewhat united in the view that we need to put up a truly conservative candidate and stop having to choose the lesser of two evils. This year we have a truly conservative candidate with proven credentials, Sen Ted Cruz, whom I support whole heartedly.
It seems, however, that he just won’t do because he is not a rich businessman who has made a life buying political influence for his personal profit. Ted Cruz is being rejected on FR, the premier conservative gathering place, for not being a Wall Street profiteer. at the same he gets panned because his wife works for a large bank.
I just wonder what some people really want. Reagan is not coming back, and I don’t think he would be universally welcomed on FR if he did. Cruz is the answer, not Trump.
Correct.
Cruz has demonstrated this time after time whether it's in the Senate, at the FTC, or arguing before SCOTUS. Cruz knows how the system works and how to work within it.
I love Ted but he has never managed anything bigger than Senate staff and his checkbook. Ted is a Ferrari in intellectual debates. But right now, we need a bulldozer. The land has to be cleared and foundations reset.
Cruz is the only conservative candidate running and has my full support but he needs to win in order to be able to do anything. At this rate I don’t see him getting anything but a VP slot.
Nobody has stood up against the Establishment more than Ted Cruz.
...Many of the concepts that Trump and Carson promote are righteous and important. They should be discussed. They should be fixed. Cruz knows that Trump’s wall must be built and he knows that illegal immigrants must be appropriately handled through things like E-Verify. He knows that religious liberties must be protected despite the trend in America that’s coming from both sides of the aisle. He has shares many of Trump’s and Carson’s ideas. The thing that makes him superior to them as a President isn’t just that he has experience. It’s that he has realistic approaches towards solving the problems. Some of the things that Trump and Carson promote sound great on the campaign trail but are utterly impossible to implement...
I think we’re referring to deporting illegals here. Sorry, that is an absolute necessity to me.
FOCUS ON THE SENATE
Arguments and presentations in RINO quarters against Cruz should be expected.What the establishment fears most is this .
Conservatives in certain states should be focusing on Senate candidates who do believe in controlling the purse and getting the government out of our bedrooms, kitchens, backyards, churches, and schools.
\
Even if it meant resorting to defunding and government shutdowns.
And by campaigning using those issues and asking why those go along, get alongs bipartisans refused to use these tactics which should have been applied with this bunch of socialistas bent on destroying this country
Georgetown University Professor
Carroll Quigley
Quotes by This Author
“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy†(Georgetown University Professor Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966.)
Doesn’t need on the job training... that is a good thing!