Posted on 11/23/2015 6:58:00 PM PST by Faith Presses On
Source blocked on FR. Link only below.
“Speaking of children of the narcissistic: homombamaâs daughter has already started with the underage drinking. She fits the model you described.
Give me a break.
Everyone I grew up with was guilty of underage drinking——my kids probably gave it a try ,and my grandkids are probably giving it a try now.
We don’t even know if Malia had a drink——she was just at a party.
Leave the kids out of it.
.
I’m surprised flotus isn’t a hopeless alcoholic after listening to him yammer on all her life.
Trump’s running for President - not for local pastor and boy scout leader...
Agreed.
BOVINE EXCREMENT.
You need to read some factual history; didums.
Nope, we are talking about the negative effects that narcisist parents have on their children. I’m criticizing homobama, not his daughter. You are a bright person, Mears, so you should be able to figure this out.
The guy who runs Vanity Fair has hated Trump for many decades and used to make fun of his fingers. This is just crap.
“You are a bright person, Mears, so you should be able to figure this out.”
—
Oh,you flatterer.
:-)
.
BRAVO !!!!!!!!!!!!!
:-)
Trump has narcissistic qualities, as do many successful high energy persons, but does not come close to the boundary of a disorder. To say he has narcissistic qualities thus is not a diagnosis and probably protected speech.
(NB I have experience in forensic evaluations but am not a lawyer.)
I was/am. I know of two narcissists who saw children as a small version of themselves and sought to mold their offspring into “mini-me’s”. Their success was mixed.
I know very little about Trump’s children, mostly just about Ivanka from her appearances on news programs.
“Christ said: “DON’T HIDE YOUR LIGHT UNDER A BARREL” and Trump isn’t. And he isn’t a narcissist at all...he’s NOTHING at all like Obama or Slick Willie Clinton the rapist and ONLY elected president to be impeached.”
Excellent Post!!
Actually there have been TWO presidents, both DEMS, who have been impeached, but the other one was NOT elected to the office. Do you know who that was ? ;^)
In the same manner, I think a lot of people think of Donald Trump as one of America's Uncles that has "just always been around".
Never really thought much about him one way or the other, just that he never really did anything to make me think ill of him. I never really envied his wealth or position, either.
Now, though, he's beginning to act like a "Bring Back The Adults" Uncle, and I kind of like it.
I love the way he metaphorically jams a banana cream pie in the face of his critics, and when they start squawking in SWJ outrage, he jams ANOTHER banana cream pie into their lying pieholes, for good measure. :)
Andrew Johnson and Slick were both impeached by the House, but neither was convicted by the Senate.
Sadly, few people know this.
One Senator refused to cast the one needed vote to remove Johnson, saying that he didn't want to be remembered as the man who removed a sitting president from office.
Damned personal insult, but understandable from those readily duped.
1. Perot and Trump are both hugely wealthy - more power to ‘em.
2. Both are very hypocritical to tout a conservative banner, deriding big bad government, when in fact, they made many Millions because of the gov’t deals they made.
Perot made much of his fortune with his company, EDS, which made Millions via Gov’t welfare data processing.
Trump repeatedly benefited from Kelo decision like eminent domain deals that screwed private property owners out of their land.
3. Both had convenient close ties to democrats well before they ran as conservatives.
Trump’s donation history shows Democratic favoritism - https://www.washingtonpost.com/ politics/ tr... Proxy
Apr 26, 2011 ... Billionaire Donald J. Trump has a highly unusual history of political contributions for a prospective Republican candidate: He has given most of
“But Trumpâs donation gap was even larger during the mid-2000s, which saw the end of Republican congressional majorities and the ascendance of the Democratic party.
Overall in the 2006 election cycle, Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr., donated $77,200 to Democrats versus only $24,250 on Republicans. Looking back to the 2004 cycle, the pair donated $40,500 to Democrats and only $17,250 to the GOP.
While the Trumps spent nearly $50,000 to elect congressional Democrats, they donated only $1,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRSC).
But perhaps the worst outcome that election for Republicans was that Pelosi and Reid became Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader, respectively. The pair made a formidable team and did heavy lifting to ensure that Obama was elected in 2008 and that much of his agenda â including Obamacare â was put in place.
4. Both are bombastic with low detail sound byte hype.
5. Neither had held elected public and have not demonstrated sound civil service CONSERVATIVE governance.
6. Both Ross Perot and Donald Trump are third party spoilers:
“He has made highly publicized forays into national politics on occasion over the past two decades. Late in 1999, as the presidency of Bill Clinton wound down, Trump was one of several contenders for the nomination of the Reform Party, the remnant of the third-party movement begun by billionaire H. Ross Perot in 1992.”
Donald Trump Swears Off Third-Party Run - WSJ
www.wsj.com/ articles/ donald-trump-l... Proxy Highlight
Sep 3, 2015 ... Donald Trump pledged Thursday that he wouldn’t launch a third-party presidential bid if he falls short of winning the Republican nomination ...
Trump resurfaces idea of third-party run | TheHill
www.thehill.com/ blogs/ ballot-box/ presidential-... Proxy Highlight
10 hours ago 11/23/2015 ... Donald Trump is again raising the possibility that he might run for president as a third-party candidate, suggesting that the Republican Party is
You did read that, right?
Donald Trump has just said that he has not ruled out a third party run, after he swore he wouldn’t on Sept 3rd.
Flaky and untrustworthy, just like Perot...
The Don, is a Spoiler, plain and simple.
People here and nation wide are being fooled with his controlled opposition candidacy charade.
I also want to believe what he says.
However, his bothersome history betrays his populist words.
Useful idiots will eventually be forced to see what they do not want to see...
RE: “Nothing, NOTHING whatsoever like that idiot Perot!
You need to read some factual history; didums.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.