So what’s wrong with a database of murdering jihadists who have sworn to kill Americans? The 50 IQ media apes should be decorating lampposts.
It is an old trick to use a term first and then quote your adversary’s answer as if he used it first.
Example:
First person: “You think I’m an a$$h0ld.”
Second person: “You wouldn’t be the first.”
First person (to someone else): “She called me an a$$hold.”
Another example:
First person: “I have a message for you from the queen of the Upper East Side.”
Second person: “She just thinks she is.”
First person (to someone else): “She said you think you’re the queen of the Upper East Side.”
Way to nail them AGAIN, Donald.
I LOVE IT!!!
Media doesn’t care about the truth.
The smear is out there and that’s all that matters. :)
Now just a cotton pickin’ minit here. Let’s be fair. A monkey can chase a weasel around a shoemaker’s bench and make it go pop. Can the same be said about the MSM?
Trump could also afford to be less rambling. Because he did refer to the technical feasibility of a registration system to prevent illegals from entering the country but it is still unclear who would be in the database and why.
When a fish stinks, the head stinks first.
Who is the head of most of the Media?
That’s the person that’s pulling the strings.
Take that person out of the picture and the media should go back to being just the media.
The lame stream media earns their contempt daily.