Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tupelo

You cannot require all citizens to be armed.

It would appear to me that the flip-side of the 2nd amendment is that while my right to bare arms is not to be infringed is that I am free to NOT carry an arm should I desire not to. Indeed if I leave in a safe, very low crime place that is isolated from the high crime areas (ahem - Guam) there may very well not be a need to be armed

Honestly, I don’t want everybody to be armed. I do not want any leftist with an agenda to even know how to use a fire arm. I want them to be scared of guns


12 posted on 11/16/2015 3:33:37 PM PST by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Fai Mao

You cannot require all citizens to be armed.

yeah you cant require all citizens to have obamacare either, but you can tax them when they dont....


15 posted on 11/16/2015 3:39:03 PM PST by rolling_stone (1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao
"...my right to bare arms..."

I always bare my arms in the summer.

25 posted on 11/16/2015 4:22:44 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Fai Mao

re: You cannot require all citizens to be armed.

I don’t know about that.
The Federals now require you to buy approved insurance. Why not guns? As I said, I was informed by the smart people here that Trump would outlaw “Gun Free” zones. So what is to stop him from just adding a paragraph requiring all adult citizens to buy a firearm from an approved dealer or manufacturer?


30 posted on 11/16/2015 7:26:47 PM PST by Tupelo (Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson