Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Pretty much all they're planning on doing is maintaining what exists and adding in some stupid trains.

Maintenance is one thing, but this country's highway needs go way beyond that. A highway generally has a functional life of about 50 years, which means the interstate highway system -- now 59 years old -- is now in a state where it is effectively being reconstructed in its entirety. That is an enormous, expensive undertaking that will eventually cost more than the original construction of the system.

13 posted on 11/13/2015 8:56:34 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("It doesn't work for me. I gotta have more cowbell!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
I would really like to see as much responsibility and money as possible be diverted from the feds to the states.

Lower the federal income tax. Expect states and localities to raise their taxes. Then use that additional state/local tax money to maintain/rebuild the roads.

I know that as a conservative I'm supposed to argue for lower taxes across the board. However, I'm OK in the short run with tax collection and spending moving from the feds to the states and cities.

18 posted on 11/13/2015 11:25:30 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson