Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/13/2015 12:00:37 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

If most of the unemployed White people vote Republican, Hillary will be swept out the door like the garbage she is. There are MANY more Whites than minorities and they are being abused by the government in countless ways, while being expected to pay their abusers! If Whites are angry enough to get even in Nov. ‘16, the Democrat Party is the one that will be mortally wounded.


2 posted on 11/13/2015 12:05:29 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A wishful diatribe by a New York Times staff writer. There are many approaches to victory; but only one approach to honor & the integrity of an American heritage.

Mr. Brooks transposes the Demographic changes over the assumption of a continuation of a two party system. That, in itself, is extremely unlikely. Many of those diverse players have clearly conflicting interests. Does Brooks just assume that they will continue to unite in hatred of the America that Conservative Republicans adhere to?

Surrendering the values of the Founding Fathers is neither in our interest nor in any sense an honorable course.

Conservatives are still able to put the cult of Diversity In Context.

4 posted on 11/13/2015 12:11:28 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
One of the reasons I'm not a registered Rep. is because people like Brooks are Reps.

This whole demographics argument is based on the idea that the Hispanics are going to let the dhimmis do to them the same thing they did to the blacks.

Maybe, maybe not. Were I Hispanic I'd look at the state of Black America and "No thanks".

Further, all these folks that pretend to know what the future holds, well, they don't.

5 posted on 11/13/2015 12:13:42 PM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Brooks spreading the same manure that cost the GOP the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections by large margins. He thinks the party can be saved by the tactics that have weakened it greatly since W’s two stupid amnesty pushes in 2006 and 2007. The Dims have been importing their new voters in large numbers since the Slick Willie years and stupid Republicans keep helping them to import more.


6 posted on 11/13/2015 12:25:43 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP is at a crossroads. Their voters want to keep the rule of law and their country.

The GOP elites are owned by The Cheap Labor Express and must deliver the amnesty candidate they have been paid for.

If they are successful in preventing us from electing a President who will enforce the laws and stop the illegal alien inundation, then the GOP should die.

No one should vote for another amnesty candidate.


7 posted on 11/13/2015 12:26:58 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

We have options:

1. buying strike (keep your job, though)
no new houses or cars, expensive wines, highly-taxed hotel rooms, etc.
2. emigration to a country that has US like tax rates
but provides better benefits to the middle class
(older folks: Poland and Hungary have Social Security reciprocity)

Another possibility is replacing the welfare state with in-family distribution of your federal tax money. Basically your relatives on the dole would get a better deal by voting for the Republican in-family plan.


8 posted on 11/13/2015 12:33:19 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The demographics of this country are changing

As always, the factoid that is uttered as a gloating threat.

9 posted on 11/13/2015 12:37:46 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There hasn’t been a Republican mayor of Chicago since 1931.


10 posted on 11/13/2015 1:21:25 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Legals hate illegals.

NYT omits that from their “analysis”.

Why would they do that?


11 posted on 11/13/2015 1:36:53 PM PST by Principled (...the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Give me liberty or give me death. I don’t think there’s any other choice.
N.Y. Times, the voice of the Serpent.


12 posted on 11/13/2015 1:59:20 PM PST by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tis a shame David Brooks is not as sharp as the crease that appeared in o-puppet’s trousers. This individual doesn’t get it now, will never get it in the future. Please, history is boring and often tends to repeat itself.


13 posted on 11/13/2015 2:32:32 PM PST by V K Lee (u TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP to TRIUMPH Follow the lead MAKE AMERICA GREAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson