Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iowa Gov. Branstad (R) Backs Eminent Domain For Pipelines
http://whotv.com ^ | 10:16pm, November 2, 2015 | Aaron Brilbeck

Posted on 11/04/2015 1:21:01 PM PST by Trumpinator

Governor Backs Eminent Domain For Pipelines

Posted 10:11 pm, November 2, 2015, by Aaron Brilbeck,

Updated at 10:16pm, November 2, 2015

DES MOINES, Iowa -- This week, the Iowa Utilities Board will discuss whether to use eminent domain to seize property from landowners to use for a massive oil pipeline.

Dakota Access, LLC wants to use the land for an underground pipeline that would carry roughly a half million barrels of crude oil from North Dakota, through Iowa and to a distribution center in Illinois. Governor Branstad says he believes eminent domain can and should be used for some pipeline projects.

"I don't think that we should say a blanket statement that eminent domain should never be used," Branstad said. "But I also believe that the law that is in place that gives the utilities board the responsibility to do it is appropriate."

(Excerpt) Read more at whotv.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; Russia; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: agitprop; antifracking; astroturf; dakotaaccessllc; drunkenciv; eminentdomain; energy; fracking; illinois; iowa; keystonepipeline; keystonexl; keywordspam; methane; northdakota; opec; paidrussiantrolls; petroleum; putinsbuttboys; russianstooge; russianstooges; terrybranstad; vladtheimploder

1 posted on 11/04/2015 1:21:01 PM PST by Trumpinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

Um, no. We have a right to contract (or not), regardless of what SCOTUS says.


2 posted on 11/04/2015 1:37:25 PM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

So what? Just another “Republican” selling his soul to big government.


3 posted on 11/04/2015 1:52:44 PM PST by Angels27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
I think this would fall under legitimate ED use by virtue of the pipeline being vital infrastructure. We're not talking about hotels, supermarkets or casinos.

From what I've seen locally, putting a pipeline in is usually a temporary disruption. A pipeline crossed a farm about a mile from me and the pipeline itself is 8 feet deep and the farmer has returned to farming right over the top of it.

In his case they did lease some of his land for some permanent infrastructure but the contract keeps the rent comparable to the changing value of the land. He just farms around the infrastructure.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
4 posted on 11/04/2015 2:06:56 PM PST by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I think this would fall under legitimate ED use by virtue of the pipeline being vital infrastructure. We're not talking about hotels, supermarkets or casinos.

Yup. Vital infrastructure = public use.

5 posted on 11/04/2015 2:13:06 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

Legit use of ED


6 posted on 11/04/2015 2:19:01 PM PST by NEPA (Give me liberty, not debt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; Conscience of a Conservative; NEPA; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; ...
/bingo

7 posted on 11/04/2015 2:30:19 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Here's to the day the forensics people scrape what's left of Putin off the ceiling of his limo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

eminent domain or a contractual easement or no gas line. That’s the long and the short of it.


8 posted on 11/04/2015 2:31:05 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

Without Eminent Domain the United States wouldn’t have an interstate system...


9 posted on 11/04/2015 3:36:26 PM PST by GOPJ (policy debates rather then journalists clowns posturing and mugging for their fellow journalistsMNJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

OH MY GOD!!!

A governor that supports the 5th Amendment. Hopefully he gets purged.


10 posted on 11/04/2015 3:37:57 PM PST by BobL ( (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpinator

I don’t know why they’re hassling him over this one pipeline. Anybody who has seen a pipeline map of Iowa wouldn’t even think twice about adding one more.


11 posted on 11/04/2015 3:43:47 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson