Posted on 11/01/2015 11:38:42 AM PST by Enlightened1
In order to deter the Syrian and Russian Air Forces inside the East Ghouta (collection of farms) region of rural Damascus, the U.S. backed moderate rebels from âJaysh Al-Islamâ (Army of Islam) and the Free Syrian Army (FSA) have placed kidnapped Alawite women in cages to protect themselves from airstrikes.
The U.S. backed Syrian Oppositionâs social media activists posted the photos of the six kidnapped Alawite women on Twitter, adding their extra commentary that included sectarian insults to degrade the helpless women and taunt the Syrian President Dr. Bashar Al-Assad.
This is not the first time that the U.S. backed moderate rebels have used the Syrian people as human shields in order to deter airstrikes; however, this blatant disregard for human life has contradicted their alleged ethos to protect the Syrian people and put an end to the government of Dr. Bashar Al-Assad.
The six women were not identified by the U.S. backed moderate rebels, but they were described by the aforementioned Islamists as Alawites, per their sectarian insults they directed towards the kidnapped civilians.
Last month, the U.S. backed moderate rebels posted pictures that displayed their fighters posing with the mutilated heads of deceased Syrian soldiers; these pictures were followed with multiple videos from the Islamists that contained death threats to the Alawite Muslims of Syria.
(Excerpt) Read more at almasdarnews.com ...
Yes, it would. He would have had a very different political situation as president compared versus gov of Mass. The country is 50/50 red blue, not deep blue. He would have been supported by a national Republican party with a strong conservative base. He probably would have had a Republican legislature. His administration would have been full of relatively conservative staffers and appointees.
It’s just silly to think that a Romney administration wold have been anywhere as liberal as the Obama administration which is packed from top to bottom with leftist ideologues.
I was amazed that a solid liberal was called a “severe conservative” by some.
They obviously ignored his record.
Lsd doesn’t even have that kind of hallucinatory power.
His Mass govt was packed with leftist ideologues he put there. Thats a fact of history.
If your position requires a person to believe that Romney would have been as destructive as Obama, then it’s a pretty lame position.
I’ll freely admit to youthful transgressions and a lot of alcohol in my young years.
There is now way in HELL I want anything strong enough to make people say the things this charater or the likeminded continue to 3 years later. Way to potent for me.
What a long strange trip it’s been.
Except the facts of his record back me up fully.
I assume, like everything else, from China.
A track record is useful when the circumstances are the same. But governing the nation is not the same as governing a deep blue state.
And of course we all knew that Obama would govern as the crypto Marxist that he is, and you helped elect him.
Well of course. People who are leftist governors always run to the polar extreme when elected President. Take Reagan for example. How could we have known he’d govern as he did?
Oh thats right. Because he governed as he did. Just as Romney would have.
You need to dig a ballot up with my name and an Obama vote on it or stop lying. Pick one.
You act like he would have had total latitude to govern like he did in MA. That is delusional. Granted Romney is a shapeshifting squish, but he ran on a conservative platform, would have had an administration staffed with conservatives in many positions, very well may have had a Republican legislature, would have won the presidency with the help of a national party that has a powerful conservative base, and would have been presiding over a country that is not deep blue. These things all matter. They would have influenced him away from governing like he did in MA.
And just to state the obvious — Romney’s not a freaking Marxist ideologue like Obama, who you helped elect.
Are you seriously going to deny that your protest vote didn’t help Obama?
Please spare the forum such silliness.
“...the U.S. backed moderate rebels from ââ¬ÅJaysh Al-Islamââ¬Â (Army of Islam) and the Free Syrian Army (FSA) have placed kidnapped Alawite women in cages...”
********************************************************************************
And these “moderate Islamists” are the crew that Obama, Kerry, Hillary and certain RINOs back.
“It’s just silly to think that a Romney administration wold have been anywhere as liberal as the Obama administration which is packed from top to bottom with leftist ideologues.”
His record is that of a solid liberal.
To try and claim otherwise is pure fantasy.
I wish you guys could just be honest and say, “Yes, we realize that Romney wouldn’t have been as destructive to the country as Obama, but we thought it was more important to make a statement to the GOPe by casting a protest vote.”
I would disagree with the thinking behind such a position but at least it would be intellectually honest.
Deal with it.
I wish you could just be honest and say, "I voted for a guy who was an amoral statist."
Instead, you blow sunshine up you own patoot by saying, "I voted against Obama."
Wish you’d be honest and admit you backed a scumbag liberal.
Yeah, the country is dealing with it. In the form of a tsunami of destruction from Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.