And someone here called me a “moron” because I was suspicious from the outset. There is ALWAYS more than one side to the story and what was posted was HER side.
That’s why you haven’t seen the person that called me a moron come back and refute.
The discussion is starting from the premise that the original diagnosis of dehydration was incorrect, but I’m not seeing that backed up by anything other than the mother’s statement. An infant with an incorrectly-functioning esophagus and an infection (elevated white blood count) is extremely likely to be dehydrated.
Thanks for posting ‘the other side’-—makes a difference