Are we REALLY debating what can be done Constitutionally about a program that should NEVER exist per the same Constitution?
That’s like arguing in tax court that the 16th violates any number of Amendments and expecting the judge to go, “Oh!? You’re right. Case dismissed.”.
Hell, we already know they never do ANYTHING per the Constitution, and yet, every 2 years, people come out of the wood-work going, “Well, (s)he doesn’t adhere only 20%, so that’s better than XYZ.”
No, I’m not debating anything. Merely stating that they are lawless POSs who expect US to follow the law while giving us the finger in the process.
.
You do have a point.