Posted on 10/27/2015 7:38:54 AM PDT by Biggirl
Tuesday on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump was asked about his deteriorating lead in the polls to his opponent, former Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson. Trump said that now Carson was a front-runner, it was likely he would face more scrutiny and that “a lot of things will come out” about Carson’s past.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Sorry bout the situation you have to live in. I think Trump will make this a top priority. If he has the right message, for each unique group of voters that Obama currently has divided them up into(except for muslims). I think Trump could run the board on the various groups and leave the Dems with mostly only the elite progressives..
If he wanted to be a uniter and use the Bible as the basis to make his case, he could use Babylon and the Tower of Babel. God got rid of the 1 common language and made it so there were many languages. Therefor mankind could no longer work together and chaos resulted. We need to reverse the process and have the whole nation using 1 language so the efforts of all would make the country stronger and harmonious.
He has released it and he has talked about it each time. Can’t help it if you weren’t listening that week. But look up his positions, and you’ll find they are practical, achievable in this political setting, and helpful.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but Carson is up in Iowa, based on polling of Repubs and Conservatives. No account of support from Indy’s, Dems and Undecideds. I recently met a NYC diehard Dem who is voting for Trump, and he was quite animated about why. . .
‘Or you could just read his position papers (which none of the other candidates have provided) to see where he stands. Or you could actually listen to him instead of taking the media’s out of context quotes. Or maybe read one of his books, where he beliefs and positions are laid out quite clearly.’
That is a good reply. The original post seemed just a little too unmoored from reality for me. But you handled it well.
How about all those specific positions he took that we are lectured about?
”Trump advocated for universal healthcare in his 2000 book, The America We Deserve, writing that the goal should be to “make reforms for the moment and, longer term, to find an equivalent of the single-payer plan that is affordable, well-administered, and provides freedom of choice.”
Trump 'just another liberal'?(April 18, 2011)
Nothing’s “coming out” until they see if Trump’s numbers fall for real.
OK then, lets just call you the average voter. That does sound nicer doesn't it. But to me your statements indicate that you are one of those who relies on “sound bites on the news” to form your opinion. I guess that you missed the memo that the media is biased and will manipulate whatever anyone says to fit their narrative. If you don't watch the entirety of what is being said you will be manipulated by the “sound bites” provided on the “news shows”.
Despite this Trump has done a better job of getting his message across than anyone else on our side of the aisle has in a very long time. His message has been resonating. But the media and establishment will be doing all that they can to defeat Trump and make Hillary our first female president.
Trump is not going to be the one making the decisions as to which sound bites make it on the news. Is he the perfect candidate? No. Is he brash and arrogant. Yes. Is he the only candidate who has addressed the invasion of our country by foreigners who have no intention of adopting our way of life and vote Democrat by 4 to 1? Yes! At this point that is the one issue that differentiates him from the rest of the field. None of the rest have the courage or honesty to address this issue.
You have repeated the official narrative of the media and the GOPe WORD FOR WORD. You have also conveniently chosen to ignore the vast body of easily available information that directly contradicts “your” opinion. Challenge yourself and do a little research
GHWB ran against Reagan with his “VOODOO economics” crap. I voted for ol man Bush reluctantly the first time, but not the second time.Ol man Bush began to unravel everything Reagan did from his first day in office. I never voted for W, because my research into his background told me he was a phony.Worse than Daaaaddy. How right I was!
So he must have advocated single payer in his much more recent—2012—’policy manifesto,’ Time to get Tough.
Well, no he didn’t. But that’s okay; nobody in this world is ever allowed to change their position. Anything any of us said 15 years ago is cast in stone forever.
I don't' agree with that at all, but MAN that's funny!!!
His investigators found amazing stuff on Obama in Hawaii, amazing... stay tuned , it was 4 years ago but he promised that we will be amazed by it....
If Trump wants to talk about Carson’s past then Trump’s past is fair game to be explored. Trump, supported single payer abortion wealth tax hitlery and other democrats and he cheated on his wife.
Go down this path Trump and your history will become the issue
If Trump wants to talk about Carson’s past then Trump’s past is fair game to be explored. Trump, supported single payer abortion wealth tax hitlery and other democrats and he cheated on his wife.
Go down this path Trump and your history will become the issue
I'll go out on a limb here, and suggest Trump may not share your view.
Just guessing, because my Trump speak isn't fluent. He probably goes with a states rights angle.
Carson was more than a competent surgeon. He was a gifted pioneer. He performed complex neurosurgery that no one else had ever dreamed of attempting. He retired at the pinnacle of his 36-year career. He did so to enter the political arena after his widely praised speech at the National Prayer Breakfast.
Ultimately, I’m okay with a state’s rights angle, if every state bans all abortions in all cases.
But that’s not where we are. So even though I’m a purist, I don’t mind gobbling up enemy territory along the way.
First, we need a way around Roe, I would prefer if the Court would simply reverse itself. A Human Life Amendment would be difficult, but in some ways, preferable. Placed in the Constitution it would be beyond the reach of the back-robed tyrants or Congress or the Executive.
If strictly-enforced,I could be persuaded to accept the Great Exception cases, as I call them, in the short-rerm.
I’d like to hear some specifics from trump, otherwise his attacks on Carson are scurriilous.
That is exactly why people all over the world are doing. Where was it Guatemala
where they just elected a comedian as president? Now I don’t know anything about that guy. But I think that what where are witnessing is that we are seeing people all over the world dissatisfied with government. So they ask them selves how do we fix this. They somewhat logically say we have to do something completely different. But I am afraid that when the people’s the last ditch effort fails then that will pave the way for the globalists to come in with a one world government. Sadly there are indeed people blindly following Trump as they will the Antichrist.
MRI is a complex technology. Radiologists are trained to read them. Doctors usually read and rely upon the radiologist’s report.
Some doctors do read the MRI, but the radiologist is the specialist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.