Posted on 10/26/2015 6:29:10 PM PDT by 100American
Revolutionaries such as John Dewey, Margaret Mead, Margaret Sanger, Herbert Marcuse and Wilhelm Reich, all of whom waxed poetically about the Soviet Union, inspired progressive educational and social policies that weakened support for organized religion, marital fidelity and the family while empowering the state.
With the help of like-minded people in Hollywood, they hammered away at social conventions of all kinds. The weapons of choice were radical individualism and moral relativism, which they peddled on college campuses to credulous liberal faculty who passed it on to their students.
By the time the 1960s rolled around, with the advent of the pill, Playboy magazine and mass communications, Western civilization was ripe for takeover by a heretofore alien, ideology of limitless sex. Of course, people weren’t told about the downside of “free love” — the destruction of families, social chaos, the loss of freedom to disagree, and a tightening statist grip on economic and intellectual liberty.
In his masterful new book, “Takedown: From Communists to Progressives, How the Left Has Sabotaged Family and Marriage,” author Paul Kengor traces a direct line from the founders of communism to today’s liberal social “reformers.”
The elements change with the times, but not the ultimate objective, which is to “progress” indefinitely toward an evolved, socialist Eden where all is shared and all are equal. Mr. Kengor notes that the progressive canon changes rapidly, and in ways that even progressives cannot always predict.
“But we do know this much: what is seemingly inconceivable to all of us right now, including to progressives themselves, may become the dogmatic position of progressives in a generation,” he writes.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Gramschi ping.
America has progressed herself right past the gates of hell.
Sad slippery slope. I remember the good old days of two parent households where divorce was rare.
past the gates of Hell? No! Straight into them.
But you’ve got the right idea :)
Back before JFK got us into Vietnam.
What’s the difference between “Radical Individualism” and “Rugged Individualism”?
Surely all individualism is good?
Radical Individualism is an expression of I will do what I want....talk
Rugged individualism gets it done, bears the kids and makes the payments... Americans, we don’t need no stinkin regulations
Tonto Hombre Con Obama, Esta Loco!!
PC has tolled the bell marking the death of tolerance. We will no longer tolerate anything that doesn’t fit our narrative. We will no longer tolerate things that “offend” us.
Magazines like the National Lampoon would not be tolerated today.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.