Posted on 10/26/2015 6:47:55 AM PDT by Isara
Ted Cruz could not have asked for a better political environment. A sizable portion of the Republican primary electorate is raging against the establishment, consistently showing support for outsiders and instigators. Party stars and career politicians have either dropped in the polls or dropped out altogether.
But Cruz isn’t leading this movement right now. Instead, Donald Trump and Ben Carson are battling to be the face of the 2016 “outsider,” dominating the polls nationally and in the early states.
...
Trump’s presence in the GOP contest has been beneficial, he said, “because it has helped frame the central issue in the primary as ‘Who will stand up to Washington?’ Now, if that’s the central issue, the next question is: Who has stood up to Washington? And my record is markedly different.”
...
...the Cruz camp believes it is built for the long run, with ground organization and infrastructure established beyond the four early voting states. In particular, Cruz is heavily invested in the slew of Southern states that vote on March 1, focusing campaign energy and resources on the so-called SEC primary where he believes his message and style resonate and where a trove of delegates will be up for grabs.
“We are in the unique position where we don’t have to win any of the first three states. Carson does have to win Iowa,” says Cruz spokesman Rick Tyler.
The campaign also believes Carson will eventually fade there as he is scrutinized more closely, and that Cruz will be able to absorb that support.
...
...Cruz will be closely watching the movements of the two frontrunners. There will probably come a time to go at them more aggressively, Tyler says, but the campaign feels comfortable waiting for now. “We’re always going to draw policy contrasts,” he says, calling Cruz the “Pavarotti” of conservative messaging.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Please click on the pictures at the top of the columns for more details on the ratings of the candidates.
Budget, Spending & Debt | |||
Civil Liberties | |||
Education | |||
Energy & Environment | |||
Foreign Policy & Defense | |||
Free Market | |||
Health Care & Entitlements | |||
Immigration | |||
Moral Issues | |||
Second Amendment | |||
Taxes, Economy & Trade |
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
Note: If you don't like the ratings for any reason, please contact Conservative Review's Editor-in-Chief, "The Great One," Mark Levin. But I have to warn you that you may get this response from him: "GET OFF THE PHONE, YOU BIG DOPE!"
That chart always makes me laugh!
Who elected conservative review to decide who’s the most conservative on any given issue? I missed that election lol
Seriously, Trump’s bad on the free market? Puleeeze!
I think the chart is pretty accurate. On Free Trade Trump got his rating because he doesn’t like trade agreements. I think he would like them better if they were negotiated by people that knew what they were doing.
I think the chart is pretty accurate. On Free Trade Trump got his rating because he doesn’t like trade agreements. I think he would like them better if they were negotiated by people that knew what they were doing.
- See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates/candidates/donald-trump#article-9
"Amanda Carpenter comes to Conservative Review fresh off an impressive tour on Capitol Hill, serving as [snip] Sen. Cruz's Speechwriter and Communications director.
See post 8, if you go to the site and investigate there are 5 main players, Amanda Carpenter is the first one listed and she works or used to work for Cruz. It’s a phony chart. Cruz who voted to reauthorize the Patriot Act gets a top grade on civil liberties? Bull S**t
That chart is pure BS. It’s flawed for all three candidates.
I love Mark Levin, listen virtually every night, but I take his “recommendations” about candidates with a grain of salt.
“I think the chart is pretty accurate.”
Drudge linked up Rush’s analysis Friday about the “script” in Washington, an analysis that is deeply disturbing because it is so spot on.
Rush mentions that the Republicans went through the charade of trying to appear in opposition to Obama’s Iran policy by way of the Corker bill when they were really doing the job for the donors who wanted Obama to succeed in implementing his Iran policy of getting rid of the sanctions.
The Republicans, INCLUDING Cruz, were in on the charade. Senator Cotton of Arkansas was the only Republican who voted against the Corker bill.
Please click on the pictures at the top of the columns for more details on the ratings of the candidates.
Budget, Spending & Debt | |||||
Civil Liberties | |||||
Education | |||||
Energy & Environment | |||||
Foreign Policy & Defense | |||||
Free Market | |||||
Health Care & Entitlements | |||||
Immigration | |||||
Moral Issues | |||||
Second Amendment | |||||
Taxes, Economy & Trade |
More at Conservative Review: https://www.conservativereview.com/2016-presidential-candidates
Note: If you don't like the ratings for any reason, please contact Conservative Review's Editor-in-Chief, "The Great One," Mark Levin. But I have to warn you that you may get this response from him: "GET OFF THE PHONE, YOU BIG DOPE!"
The Conservative Review is simply giving their opinion. Your "who elected" comment is of course a straw man.
Seriously, Trumps bad on the free market? Puleeeze!
Apparently their ratings are based on the candidates full political history. For Trump that would include many years where he sucked.
There are two things that have bothered me about Ted Cruz. The Corker bill situation that you just mentioned and the fact that the republican senate fund raising organization (NRSC) that Cruz was vice chairman of, went after McDaniel in Mississippi. Yes, I understand that it was more than likely McConnell’s doing, but I believe he should have named names and resigned from the organization. That he didn’t do those things has always bothered me.
A "tour" of what? She was a flunky for some congressthing?
I'm not impressed.
“Your “who elected” comment is of course a straw man.”
Sheesh, debate ruling noted lol
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.